NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 831x more texture fill rate: 175.0 GTexel/s vs 210.6 GTexel / s
- Around 13% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 2048
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 52% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 68305 vs 44918
- Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 220.867 vs 150.951
- Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2046.214 vs 1718.593
- Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 16.026 vs 12.283
- 3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 94.532 vs 28.289
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 15 August 2016 |
| Texture fill rate | 175.0 GTexel/s vs 210.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2304 vs 2048 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt vs 150 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 68305 vs 44918 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 220.867 vs 150.951 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2046.214 vs 1718.593 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.026 vs 12.283 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.532 vs 28.289 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3706 vs 3691 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 vs 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3706 vs 3691 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 vs 3340 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
- 2.5x more core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 600 MHz
- Around 35% higher boost clock speed: 1645 MHz vs 1215 MHz
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10465 vs 8366
- Around 76% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 603 vs 343
- Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 710.366 vs 645.647
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13765 vs 10140
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13765 vs 10140
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1506 MHz vs 600 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1645 MHz vs 1215 MHz |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 10465 vs 8366 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 603 vs 343 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 710.366 vs 645.647 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13765 vs 10140 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13765 vs 10140 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8366 | 10465 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 343 | 603 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 68305 | 44918 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 220.867 | 150.951 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2046.214 | 1718.593 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.026 | 12.283 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.532 | 28.289 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 645.647 | 710.366 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10140 | 13765 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3706 | 3691 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10140 | 13765 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3706 | 3691 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3340 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5530 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Code name | TU106 | GP104B |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 15 August 2016 |
| Place in performance rating | 325 | 312 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $389.99 | |
| Price now | $359.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 43.18 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1215 MHz | 1645 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 1506 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 16 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 175.0 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 11.20 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.599 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 2048 |
| Pixel fill rate | 77.76 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 175.0 GTexel/s | 210.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Transistor count | 10800 million | 7,200 million |
| CUDA cores | 1920 | |
| Floating-point performance | 6,738 gflops | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 94 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Width | IGP | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 256 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory clock speed | 8 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Ansel | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| ShadowWorks | ||
| SLI | ||
| Virtual Reality | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q with others
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 Max-Q vs
ATIRadeon X1950 CrossFire Edition
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 Max-Q vs
ATIFirePro 2450 Multi-View
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGRID K140Q
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega M GH
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAP102-100
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 3 GB
