NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 37% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 175.0 GTexel/s versus 128.2 GTexel/s
- Environ 50% de pipelines plus haut: 2304 versus 1536
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 68305 versus 52065
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 220.867 versus 195.93
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2046.214 versus 1919.95
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 16.026 versus 14.6
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 645.647 versus 492.867
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 27 May 2019 versus 23 April 2019 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 175.0 GTexel/s versus 128.2 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 2304 versus 1536 |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 68305 versus 52065 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 220.867 versus 195.93 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2046.214 versus 1919.95 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.026 versus 14.6 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 645.647 versus 492.867 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
- Environ 90% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1140 MHz versus 600 MHz
- Environ 10% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1335 MHz versus 1215 MHz
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 8589 versus 8279
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 362 versus 340
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12301 versus 10140
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12301 versus 10140
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1140 MHz versus 600 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1335 MHz versus 1215 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8589 versus 8279 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 362 versus 340 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.964 versus 94.532 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12301 versus 10140 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 versus 3706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12301 versus 10140 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 versus 3706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3351 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8279 | 8589 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 340 | 362 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 68305 | 52065 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 220.867 | 195.93 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2046.214 | 1919.95 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.026 | 14.6 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.532 | 94.964 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 645.647 | 492.867 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10140 | 12301 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3706 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10140 | 12301 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3706 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3358 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4918 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Nom de code | TU106 | TU116 |
| Date de sortie | 27 May 2019 | 23 April 2019 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 337 | 338 |
| Genre | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1215 MHz | 1335 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 600 MHz | 1140 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 175.0 GFLOPS | 128.2 GFLOPS |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 11.20 TFLOPS | 8.202 TFLOPS |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.599 TFLOPS | 4.101 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 1536 |
| Pixel fill rate | 77.76 GPixel/s | 64.08 GPixel/s |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 175.0 GTexel/s | 128.2 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt | 60 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 10800 million | 6600 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
| Largeur | IGP | |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 6 GB | 6 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | 288.0 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 192 bit |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q avec des autres
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon RX 580
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega M GH
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAQuadro P3200 Mobile
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 3 GB
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon Pro W5500
