NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Tesla M40

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q and NVIDIA Tesla M40 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q

NVIDIA Tesla M40

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q

Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 6 month(s) later
Around 9% higher boost clock speed: 1215 MHz vs 1114 MHz
818.1x more texture fill rate: 175.0 GTexel/s vs 213.9 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
4.2x lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 250 Watt
Around 82% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 68305 vs 37593
Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 220.867 vs 183.81
Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 16.026 vs 13.059

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	27 May 2019 vs 10 November 2015
Boost clock speed	1215 MHz vs 1114 MHz
Texture fill rate	175.0 GTexel/s vs 213.9 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	60 Watt vs 250 Watt
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	68305 vs 37593
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	220.867 vs 183.81
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	16.026 vs 13.059

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M40

Around 58% higher core clock speed: 948 MHz vs 600 MHz
Around 33% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 2304
2x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 6 GB
Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10183 vs 8366
Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 467 vs 343
Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2637.997 vs 2046.214
Around 70% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 160.359 vs 94.532
Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 688.388 vs 645.647

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	948 MHz vs 600 MHz
Pipelines	3072 vs 2304
Maximum memory size	12 GB vs 6 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	10183 vs 8366
PassMark - G2D Mark	467 vs 343
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	2637.997 vs 2046.214
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	160.359 vs 94.532
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	688.388 vs 645.647

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla M40

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

8366

10183

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

343

467

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

68305

37593

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

220.867

183.81

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2046.214

2637.997

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

16.026

13.059

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

94.532

160.359

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

645.647

688.388

Name	NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q	NVIDIA Tesla M40
PassMark - G3D Mark	8366	10183
PassMark - G2D Mark	343	467
Geekbench - OpenCL	68305	37593
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	220.867	183.81
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	2046.214	2637.997
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	16.026	13.059
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	94.532	160.359
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	645.647	688.388
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	10140
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3706
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3351
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	10140
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3706
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3351

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q	NVIDIA Tesla M40
Essentials
Architecture	Turing	Maxwell 2.0
Code name	TU106	GM200
Launch date	27 May 2019	10 November 2015
Place in performance rating	325	249
Type	Mobile workstation	Workstation
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1215 MHz	1114 MHz
Core clock speed	600 MHz	948 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	175.0 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	11.20 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	5.599 TFLOPS
Pipelines	2304	3072
Pixel fill rate	77.76 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	175.0 GTexel/s	213.9 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	60 Watt	250 Watt
Transistor count	10800 million	8,000 million
Floating-point performance		6,844 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Width	IGP
Length		267 mm
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	12 GB
Memory bandwidth	448 GB/s	288.0 GB / s
Memory bus width	256 bit	384 Bit
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Memory clock speed		6008 MHz