NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 120 Watt
- Around 75% higher memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 8004 MHz
- Around 10% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 63723 vs 57928
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 14 March 2019 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 120 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 8004 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 63723 vs 57928 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 vs 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 vs 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 vs 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 vs 3359 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
- Around 62% higher core clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 945 MHz
- Around 29% higher boost clock speed: 1785 MHz vs 1380 MHz
- Around 54% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 777 vs 503
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11661 vs 11021
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14998 vs 14496
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14998 vs 14496
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1530 MHz vs 945 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1785 MHz vs 1380 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 777 vs 503 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11661 vs 11021 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14998 vs 14496 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14998 vs 14496 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 503 | 777 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11021 | 11661 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 63723 | 57928 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14496 | 14998 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14496 | 14998 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 | 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 | 3359 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 189.842 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1902.867 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.408 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 116.183 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 875.838 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5414 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Code name | N19E-Q1 | TU116 |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 14 March 2019 |
| Place in performance rating | 247 | 248 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $219 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1380 MHz | 1785 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 945 MHz | 1530 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 198.7 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 12.72 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 6.359 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2304 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 88.32 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 198.7 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 120 Watt |
| Transistor count | 10800 million | 6,600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| DisplayPort count | 1 | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | Large | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Length | 229 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 8004 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | |
Technologies |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 with others
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M6000
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M380
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M6000 24 GB
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
