NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 50% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 80 Watt versus 120 Watt
- Environ 75% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 8004 MHz
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 63723 versus 57928
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 27 May 2019 versus 14 March 2019 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt versus 120 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 8004 MHz |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 63723 versus 57928 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 versus 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 versus 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 versus 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 versus 3359 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
- Environ 62% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1530 MHz versus 945 MHz
- Environ 29% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1785 MHz versus 1380 MHz
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 777 versus 503
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 11661 versus 11021
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14998 versus 14496
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14998 versus 14496
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1530 MHz versus 945 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1785 MHz versus 1380 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 777 versus 503 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11661 versus 11021 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14998 versus 14496 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14998 versus 14496 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 503 | 777 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11021 | 11661 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 63723 | 57928 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14496 | 14998 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14496 | 14998 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 | 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 | 3359 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 189.842 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1902.867 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.408 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 116.183 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 875.838 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5414 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Nom de code | N19E-Q1 | TU116 |
| Date de sortie | 27 May 2019 | 14 March 2019 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 247 | 248 |
| Genre | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $219 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1380 MHz | 1785 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 945 MHz | 1530 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 198.7 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 12.72 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 6.359 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2304 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 88.32 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 198.7 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 120 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 10800 million | 6,600 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| Compte DisplayPort | 1 | |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | Large | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Longeur | 229 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 6 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 Bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | 8004 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | |
Technologies |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 avec des autres
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M6000
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M380
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M6000 24 GB
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
