NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile vs AMD Radeon RX 5700
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile and AMD Radeon RX 5700 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
- 1004.8x more texture fill rate: 249.6 GTexel/s vs 248.4 GT/s
- Around 64% lower typical power consumption: 110 Watt vs 180 Watt
- Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19529 vs 11536
- Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19529 vs 11536
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 249.6 GTexel/s vs 248.4 GT/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt vs 180 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19529 vs 11536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19529 vs 11536 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5700
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- Around 32% higher core clock speed: 1465 MHz vs 1110 MHz
- Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1725 MHz vs 1560 MHz
- Around 14% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 8492 vs 7438
- Around 68% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 879 vs 523
- Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14385 vs 12307
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 July 2019 vs 27 May 2019 |
Core clock speed | 1465 MHz vs 1110 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1725 MHz vs 1560 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8492 vs 7438 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 879 vs 523 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14385 vs 12307 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 vs 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 vs 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3366 vs 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3366 vs 3356 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 5700
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile | AMD Radeon RX 5700 |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7438 | 8492 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 523 | 879 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12307 | 14385 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19529 | 11536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19529 | 11536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3723 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3723 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3366 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3366 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 66107 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 209.509 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3686.851 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.941 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 250 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1036.448 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile | AMD Radeon RX 5700 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | RDNA |
Code name | TU104 | Navi 10 |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 7 July 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 185 | 188 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $350 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz | 1725 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1110 MHz | 1465 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 249.6 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.97 TFLOPS (2:1) | 15.9 TFLOPs |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.987 TFLOPS | 7.95 TFLOPs |
Pipelines | 2560 | |
Pixel fill rate | 99.84 GPixel/s | 110.4 GP/s |
Texture fill rate | 249.6 GTexel/s | 248.4 GT/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt | 180 Watt |
Transistor count | 13600 million | 10.3 B |
Compute units | 36 | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Stream Processors | 2304 | |
Texture Units | 144 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1 x 8-pin and 1x6 pin |
Width | IGP | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) | |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready |