NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile versus AMD Radeon RX 5700
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile and AMD Radeon RX 5700 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 249.6 GTexel/s versus 248.4 GT/s
- Environ 64% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 110 Watt versus 180 Watt
- Environ 69% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19529 versus 11536
- Environ 69% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19529 versus 11536
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 249.6 GTexel/s versus 248.4 GT/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt versus 180 Watt |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19529 versus 11536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19529 versus 11536 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 5700
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 32% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1465 MHz versus 1110 MHz
- Environ 11% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1725 MHz versus 1560 MHz
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 8492 versus 7438
- Environ 68% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 879 versus 523
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 14385 versus 12307
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 7 July 2019 versus 27 May 2019 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1465 MHz versus 1110 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1725 MHz versus 1560 MHz |
Référence | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8492 versus 7438 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 879 versus 523 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14385 versus 12307 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 versus 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 versus 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3366 versus 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3366 versus 3356 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 5700
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile | AMD Radeon RX 5700 |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7438 | 8492 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 523 | 879 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12307 | 14385 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19529 | 11536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19529 | 11536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3723 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3723 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3366 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3366 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 66107 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 209.509 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3686.851 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.941 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 250 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1036.448 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile | AMD Radeon RX 5700 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | RDNA |
Nom de code | TU104 | Navi 10 |
Date de sortie | 27 May 2019 | 7 July 2019 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 185 | 188 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $350 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1560 MHz | 1725 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1110 MHz | 1465 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 249.6 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.97 TFLOPS (2:1) | 15.9 TFLOPs |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.987 TFLOPS | 7.95 TFLOPs |
Pipelines | 2560 | |
Pixel fill rate | 99.84 GPixel/s | 110.4 GP/s |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 249.6 GTexel/s | 248.4 GT/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt | 180 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 13600 million | 10.3 B |
Unités de Compute | 36 | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Stream Processors | 2304 | |
Texture Units | 144 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1 x 8-pin and 1x6 pin |
Largeur | IGP | |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 256 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready |