NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 and AMD Radeon R9 FURY X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 47% higher boost clock speed: 1545 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- 827.8x more texture fill rate: 222.5 GTexel/s vs 268.8 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 72% lower typical power consumption: 160 Watt vs 275 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 55% higher memory clock speed: 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) vs 1050 MHz
- Around 50% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 232.933 vs 155.307
- Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3728.135 vs 3431.249
- Around 99% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 24.872 vs 12.49
- Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1011.233 vs 857.575
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20206 vs 8673
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20206 vs 8673
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 November 2018 vs 24 June 2015 |
| Boost clock speed | 1545 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 222.5 GTexel/s vs 268.8 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt vs 275 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) vs 1050 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 232.933 vs 155.307 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3728.135 vs 3431.249 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.872 vs 12.49 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1011.233 vs 857.575 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20206 vs 8673 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20206 vs 8673 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
- Around 78% higher pipelines: 4096 vs 2304
- Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 153.089 vs 136.223
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8925 vs 3714
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8925 vs 3714
- 2.7x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5170 vs 1898
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 4096 vs 2304 |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 153.089 vs 136.223 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8925 vs 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 vs 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8925 vs 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 vs 3359 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5170 vs 1898 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 | AMD Radeon R9 FURY X |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 85279 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 232.933 | 155.307 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3728.135 | 3431.249 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.872 | 12.49 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.223 | 153.089 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1011.233 | 857.575 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20206 | 8673 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 8925 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3361 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20206 | 8673 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 8925 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3361 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1898 | 5170 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9580 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 803 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 | AMD Radeon R9 FURY X | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 3.0 |
| Code name | TU104 | Fiji |
| GCN generation | Quadro RTX | |
| Launch date | 13 November 2018 | 24 June 2015 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $899 | $649 |
| Place in performance rating | 214 | 216 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon R9 Fury Series | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1545 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1005 MHz | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 222.5 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 14.24 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.119 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 4096 |
| Pixel fill rate | 98.88 GPixel/s | |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Texture fill rate | 222.5 GTexel/s | 268.8 GTexel / s |
| Texture Units | 144 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt | 275 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13600 million | 8,900 million |
| Compute units | 64 | |
| Floating-point performance | 8,602 gflops | |
| Stream Processors | 4096 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 9.5 inches (241 mm) | 191 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
| Mantle | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 416.0 GB/s | 512 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 4096 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) | 1050 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) |
| High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| FRTC | ||
| HD3D | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TressFX | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 with others
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 4500 X2
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
AMDRadeon R9 FURY X
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 5600 XT
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
AppleA14 Bionic
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
AMDRadeon 740M
