NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- 627.8x more texture fill rate: 222.5 GTexel/s vs 354.4 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 56% lower typical power consumption: 160 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 27% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 85507 vs 67458
- Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 232.933 vs 205.837
- Around 55% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3728.135 vs 2406.499
- Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 24.872 vs 19.591
- 5.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 136.223 vs 25.833
- Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1011.233 vs 1002.573
- Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20206 vs 15019
- Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20206 vs 15019
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 November 2018 vs 10 March 2017 |
| Texture fill rate | 222.5 GTexel/s vs 354.4 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 85507 vs 67458 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 232.933 vs 205.837 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3728.135 vs 2406.499 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.872 vs 19.591 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.223 vs 25.833 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1011.233 vs 1002.573 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20206 vs 15019 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20206 vs 15019 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3357 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
- Around 47% higher core clock speed: 1481 MHz vs 1005 MHz
- Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1582 MHz vs 1545 MHz
- Around 56% higher pipelines: 3584 vs 2304
- Around 38% higher maximum memory size: 11 GB vs 8 GB
- 6.8x more memory clock speed: 11008 MHz vs 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective)
- Around 26% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 9874 vs 7856
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1481 MHz vs 1005 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1582 MHz vs 1545 MHz |
| Pipelines | 3584 vs 2304 |
| Maximum memory size | 11 GB vs 8 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 11008 MHz vs 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 vs 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 vs 3714 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 9874 vs 7856 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 85507 | 67458 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 232.933 | 205.837 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3728.135 | 2406.499 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.872 | 19.591 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.223 | 25.833 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1011.233 | 1002.573 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20206 | 15019 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20206 | 15019 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3357 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7856 | 9874 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 18567 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 934 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Code name | TU104 | GP102 |
| GCN generation | Quadro RTX | |
| Launch date | 13 November 2018 | 10 March 2017 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $899 | $699 |
| Place in performance rating | 208 | 206 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Price now | $826.98 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 27.48 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1545 MHz | 1582 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1005 MHz | 1481 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 16 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 222.5 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 14.24 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.119 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 3584 |
| Pixel fill rate | 98.88 GPixel/s | |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Texture fill rate | 222.5 GTexel/s | 354.4 GTexel / s |
| Texture Units | 144 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13600 million | 11,800 million |
| Floating-point performance | 11,340 gflops | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 91 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 9.5 inches (241 mm) | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 11 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 416.0 GB/s | 484.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 352 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) | 11008 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5X |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Ansel | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| HDMI 2.0b | ||
| PCIe 3.0 | ||
| SLI | ||
| Virtual Reality | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 with others
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
AMDRadeon Vega Frontier Edition
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
AMDRadeon PRO WX 9100
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 5600 XT
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 590 GME
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6550M
