NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 versus AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 and AMD Radeon R9 FURY X pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 47% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1545 MHz versus 1050 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 222.5 GTexel/s versus 268.8 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 72% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 160 Watt versus 275 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 4 GB
- Environ 55% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) versus 1050 MHz
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 232.933 versus 155.307
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3728.135 versus 3431.249
- Environ 99% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 24.872 versus 12.49
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1011.233 versus 857.575
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20206 versus 8673
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20206 versus 8673
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 13 November 2018 versus 24 June 2015 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1545 MHz versus 1050 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 222.5 GTexel/s versus 268.8 GTexel / s |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt versus 275 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 4 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) versus 1050 MHz |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 232.933 versus 155.307 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3728.135 versus 3431.249 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.872 versus 12.49 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1011.233 versus 857.575 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20206 versus 8673 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20206 versus 8673 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
- Environ 78% de pipelines plus haut: 4096 versus 2304
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 153.089 versus 136.223
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8925 versus 3714
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8925 versus 3714
- 2.7x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5170 versus 1898
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 4096 versus 2304 |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 153.089 versus 136.223 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8925 versus 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 versus 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8925 versus 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 versus 3359 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5170 versus 1898 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 | AMD Radeon R9 FURY X |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 85279 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 232.933 | 155.307 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3728.135 | 3431.249 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.872 | 12.49 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.223 | 153.089 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1011.233 | 857.575 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20206 | 8673 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 8925 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3361 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20206 | 8673 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 8925 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3361 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1898 | 5170 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9580 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 803 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 | AMD Radeon R9 FURY X | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 3.0 |
| Nom de code | TU104 | Fiji |
| Génération GCN | Quadro RTX | |
| Date de sortie | 13 November 2018 | 24 June 2015 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $899 | $649 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 214 | 216 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Conception | AMD Radeon R9 Fury Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1545 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1005 MHz | |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 222.5 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 14.24 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.119 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 4096 |
| Pixel fill rate | 98.88 GPixel/s | |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 222.5 GTexel/s | 268.8 GTexel / s |
| Texture Units | 144 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt | 275 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 13600 million | 8,900 million |
| Unités de Compute | 64 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 8,602 gflops | |
| Stream Processors | 4096 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Nombre d’écrans Eyefinity | 6 | |
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 9.5 inches (241 mm) | 191 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
| Mantle | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 416.0 GB/s | 512 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 4096 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) | 1050 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) |
| Mémoire de la bande passante haute (HBM) | ||
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| FRTC | ||
| HD3D | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TressFX | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 avec des autres
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 4500 X2
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
AMDRadeon R9 FURY X
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 5600 XT
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
AppleA14 Bionic
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
AMDRadeon 740M
