NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 versus AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 and AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 4 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 222.5 GTexel/s versus 409.6 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 14 nm
- Environ 88% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 160 Watt versus 300 Watt
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 85799 versus 76041
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 232.933 versus 190.25
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3728.135 versus 3611.018
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 24.872 versus 17.789
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20206 versus 12980
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20206 versus 12980
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7856 versus 7074
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 13 November 2018 versus 27 June 2017 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 222.5 GTexel/s versus 409.6 GTexel / s |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 14 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt versus 300 Watt |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 85799 versus 76041 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 232.933 versus 190.25 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3728.135 versus 3611.018 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.872 versus 17.789 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20206 versus 12980 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20206 versus 12980 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 3356 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7856 versus 7074 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
- Environ 38% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1382 MHz versus 1005 MHz
- Environ 4% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1600 MHz versus 1545 MHz
- Environ 78% de pipelines plus haut: 4096 versus 2304
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 16 GB versus 8 GB
- Environ 16% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1890 MHz versus 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective)
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 181.113 versus 136.223
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1373.944 versus 1011.233
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1382 MHz versus 1005 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1600 MHz versus 1545 MHz |
| Pipelines | 4096 versus 2304 |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 16 GB versus 8 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1890 MHz versus 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 181.113 versus 136.223 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1373.944 versus 1011.233 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 versus 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 versus 3714 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 | AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 85799 | 76041 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 232.933 | 190.25 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3728.135 | 3611.018 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.872 | 17.789 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.223 | 181.113 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1011.233 | 1373.944 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20206 | 12980 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20206 | 12980 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3356 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7856 | 7074 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13040 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 737 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 | AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.0 |
| Nom de code | TU104 | Vega 10 |
| Génération GCN | Quadro RTX | |
| Date de sortie | 13 November 2018 | 27 June 2017 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $899 | $999 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 207 | 210 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Prix maintenant | $999.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 14.37 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1545 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1005 MHz | 1382 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 222.5 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 14.24 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.119 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 4096 |
| Pixel fill rate | 98.88 GPixel/s | |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 222.5 GTexel/s | 409.6 GTexel / s |
| Texture Units | 144 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt | 300 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 13600 million | 12,500 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 13,107 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 9.5 inches (241 mm) | 267 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 416.0 GB/s | 483.8 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 2048 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) | 1890 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 avec des autres
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
AMDRadeon Vega Frontier Edition
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
AMDRadeon PRO WX 9100
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 5600 XT
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
AMDRadeon 780M
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6550M
