NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 vs AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 and AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 1545 MHz vs 1500 MHz
- 579.4x more texture fill rate: 222.5 GTexel/s vs 384.0 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- Around 44% lower typical power consumption: 160 Watt vs 230 Watt
- Around 32% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 85558 vs 64683
- Around 62% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 282.628 vs 174.714
- Around 43% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 24.719 vs 17.305
- Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20206 vs 13848
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 vs 3680
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 3336
- Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20206 vs 13848
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 vs 3680
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 3336
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 November 2018 vs 10 July 2017 |
| Boost clock speed | 1545 MHz vs 1500 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 222.5 GTexel/s vs 384.0 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt vs 230 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 85558 vs 64683 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 282.628 vs 174.714 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.719 vs 17.305 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20206 vs 13848 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 vs 3680 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3336 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20206 vs 13848 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 vs 3680 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3336 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100
- Around 19% higher core clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1005 MHz
- Around 78% higher pipelines: 4096 vs 2304
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 16% higher memory clock speed: 1890 MHz vs 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective)
- Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3924.968 vs 3403.106
- Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 175.219 vs 136.919
- Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1226.861 vs 1010.818
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 1005 MHz |
| Pipelines | 4096 vs 2304 |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 1890 MHz vs 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3924.968 vs 3403.106 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 175.219 vs 136.919 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1226.861 vs 1010.818 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
GPU 2: AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 | AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 85558 | 64683 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 282.628 | 174.714 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3403.106 | 3924.968 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.719 | 17.305 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.919 | 175.219 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1010.818 | 1226.861 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20206 | 13848 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3680 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3336 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20206 | 13848 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3680 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3336 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7856 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12844 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 769 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 | AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.0 |
| Code name | TU104 | Vega 10 |
| GCN generation | Quadro RTX | |
| Launch date | 13 November 2018 | 10 July 2017 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $899 | $1,599 |
| Place in performance rating | 195 | 196 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1545 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1005 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 222.5 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 14.24 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.119 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 4096 |
| Pixel fill rate | 98.88 GPixel/s | |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Texture fill rate | 222.5 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel / s |
| Texture Units | 144 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt | 230 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13600 million | 12,500 million |
| Floating-point performance | 12,288 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 6x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 9.5 inches (241 mm) | 267 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 416.0 GB/s | 483.8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 2048 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) | 1890 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 with others
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 4500 X2
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
AMDRadeon PRO WX 9100
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
AMDRadeon Pro W5700
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 5600 XT
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
AMDRadeon Pro VII
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
AMDRadeon 780M
