NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 vs NVIDIA Quadro P6000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 and NVIDIA Quadro P6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 563.6x more texture fill rate: 222.5 GTexel/s vs 394.8 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 56% lower typical power consumption: 160 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 33% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 85209 vs 63932
- Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 232.933 vs 194.277
- Around 95% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3728.135 vs 1916.09
- Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 24.872 vs 17.951
- 4.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 136.223 vs 31.471
- Around 85% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1011.233 vs 545.751
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20206 vs 20035
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20206 vs 20035
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 November 2018 vs 1 October 2016 |
| Texture fill rate | 222.5 GTexel/s vs 394.8 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 85209 vs 63932 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 232.933 vs 194.277 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3728.135 vs 1916.09 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.872 vs 17.951 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.223 vs 31.471 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1011.233 vs 545.751 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20206 vs 20035 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20206 vs 20035 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3356 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P6000
- Around 50% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 1005 MHz
- Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1645 MHz vs 1545 MHz
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 3840 vs 2304
- 3x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 8 GB
- 5.5x more memory clock speed: 9016 MHz vs 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective)
- 4.7x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 8770 vs 1873
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1506 MHz vs 1005 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1645 MHz vs 1545 MHz |
| Pipelines | 3840 vs 2304 |
| Maximum memory size | 24 GB vs 8 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 9016 MHz vs 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 3714 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8770 vs 1873 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P6000
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 | NVIDIA Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 85209 | 63932 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 232.933 | 194.277 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3728.135 | 1916.09 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.872 | 17.951 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.223 | 31.471 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1011.233 | 545.751 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20206 | 20035 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20206 | 20035 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3356 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1873 | 8770 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 15451 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 725 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 | NVIDIA Quadro P6000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Code name | TU104 | GP102 |
| GCN generation | Quadro RTX | |
| Launch date | 13 November 2018 | 1 October 2016 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $899 | $5,999 |
| Place in performance rating | 211 | 204 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Price now | $4,403.52 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 3.90 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1545 MHz | 1645 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1005 MHz | 1506 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 16 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 222.5 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 14.24 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.119 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 3840 |
| Pixel fill rate | 98.88 GPixel/s | |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Texture fill rate | 222.5 GTexel/s | 394.8 GTexel / s |
| Texture Units | 144 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13600 million | 11,800 million |
| Floating-point performance | 12,634 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort, DVI-D DP DP DP DP 3-pin Stereo |
| Multi-display synchronization | Quadro Sync II | |
| Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 9.5 inches (241 mm) | 267 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1 x 8-pin |
| SLI options | 1 | |
| Width | 2" (5.1 cm) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 24 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 416.0 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) | 9016 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | 384 Bit |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| ECC (Error Correcting Code) | ||
| High-Performance Video I/O6 | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Desktop Management | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 with others
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
NVIDIATITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
NVIDIATITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 5600 XT
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5300
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
AppleA14 Bionic
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
IntelArc Pro A30M
