NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 versus NVIDIA Quadro P6000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 and NVIDIA Quadro P6000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 1 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 222.5 GTexel/s versus 394.8 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 16 nm
- Environ 56% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 160 Watt versus 250 Watt
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 85209 versus 63932
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 232.933 versus 194.277
- Environ 95% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3728.135 versus 1916.09
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 24.872 versus 17.951
- 4.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 136.223 versus 31.471
- Environ 85% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1011.233 versus 545.751
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20206 versus 20035
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20206 versus 20035
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 13 November 2018 versus 1 October 2016 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 222.5 GTexel/s versus 394.8 GTexel / s |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt versus 250 Watt |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 85209 versus 63932 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 232.933 versus 194.277 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3728.135 versus 1916.09 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.872 versus 17.951 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.223 versus 31.471 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1011.233 versus 545.751 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20206 versus 20035 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20206 versus 20035 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 3356 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro P6000
- Environ 50% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1506 MHz versus 1005 MHz
- Environ 6% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1645 MHz versus 1545 MHz
- Environ 67% de pipelines plus haut: 3840 versus 2304
- 3x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 24 GB versus 8 GB
- 5.5x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 9016 MHz versus 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective)
- 4.7x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 8770 versus 1873
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1506 MHz versus 1005 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1645 MHz versus 1545 MHz |
| Pipelines | 3840 versus 2304 |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 24 GB versus 8 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 9016 MHz versus 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 versus 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 versus 3714 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8770 versus 1873 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P6000
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 | NVIDIA Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 85209 | 63932 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 232.933 | 194.277 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3728.135 | 1916.09 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.872 | 17.951 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.223 | 31.471 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1011.233 | 545.751 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20206 | 20035 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20206 | 20035 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3356 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1873 | 8770 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 15451 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 725 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 | NVIDIA Quadro P6000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Nom de code | TU104 | GP102 |
| Génération GCN | Quadro RTX | |
| Date de sortie | 13 November 2018 | 1 October 2016 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $899 | $5,999 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 211 | 204 |
| Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
| Prix maintenant | $4,403.52 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 3.90 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1545 MHz | 1645 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1005 MHz | 1506 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 16 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 222.5 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 14.24 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.119 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 3840 |
| Pixel fill rate | 98.88 GPixel/s | |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 222.5 GTexel/s | 394.8 GTexel / s |
| Texture Units | 144 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 13600 million | 11,800 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 12,634 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort, DVI-D DP DP DP DP 3-pin Stereo |
| Synchronization de plusieurs écrans | Quadro Sync II | |
| Nombre d’écrans á la fois | 4 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 9.5 inches (241 mm) | 267 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 1 x 8-pin |
| Options SLI | 1 | |
| Largeur | 2" (5.1 cm) | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 24 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 416.0 GB/s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 384 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) | 9016 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | 384 Bit |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| ECC (Error Correcting Code) | ||
| High-Performance Video I/O6 | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Desktop Management | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 avec des autres
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
NVIDIATITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
NVIDIATITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 5600 XT
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5300
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
AppleA14 Bionic
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
IntelArc Pro A30M
