NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q and AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- 2.9x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 230 Watt
- Around 19% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 83044 vs 69812
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19377 vs 13044
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19377 vs 13044
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 13 August 2018 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 230 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 83044 vs 69812 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19377 vs 13044 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19377 vs 13044 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
- 2x more core clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 600 MHz
- Around 13% higher boost clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 1350 MHz
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13932 vs 13640
- Around 40% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 815 vs 584
- Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7164 vs 3717
- 9.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 30936 vs 3357
- Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7164 vs 3717
- 9.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 30936 vs 3357
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 600 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1530 MHz vs 1350 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13932 vs 13640 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 815 vs 584 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7164 vs 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 30936 vs 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7164 vs 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 30936 vs 3357 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q | AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13640 | 13932 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 584 | 815 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 83044 | 69812 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19377 | 13044 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 7164 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 30936 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19377 | 13044 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 7164 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 30936 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7879 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 171.616 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4031.404 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.925 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 247.788 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1195.863 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q | AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.0 |
| Code name | TU104 | Vega 10 |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 13 August 2018 |
| Place in performance rating | 169 | 118 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | |
| Price now | $999 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 13.37 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1350 MHz | 1530 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 259.2 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 16.59 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.294 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 3072 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 86.40 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 259.2 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 230 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13600 million | 12,500 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Width | IGP | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q with others
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 64
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 64X
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega II
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Mobile
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIARTX A3000 Mobile
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIACMP 40HX
