NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q and AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
  • 2.9x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 230 Watt
  • Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14699 vs 11403
  • Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 18454 vs 13044
  • Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 18454 vs 13044
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 27 May 2019 vs 13 August 2018
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm vs 14 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 80 Watt vs 230 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 14699 vs 11403
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 18454 vs 13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 18454 vs 13044

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

  • 2x more core clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 600 MHz
  • Around 13% higher boost clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 1350 MHz
  • Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 742 vs 586
  • 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 186736 vs 90578
  • Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7164 vs 3714
  • Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7164 vs 3714
  • 9.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 30936 vs 3355
  • 9.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 30936 vs 3355
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1200 MHz vs 600 MHz
Boost clock speed 1530 MHz vs 1350 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 742 vs 586
Geekbench - OpenCL 186736 vs 90578
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 7164 vs 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 7164 vs 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 30936 vs 3355
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 30936 vs 3355

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
586
742
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
14699
11403
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
90578
186736
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
18454
13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
18454
13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3714
7164
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3714
7164
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3355
30936
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3355
30936
Name NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
PassMark - G2D Mark 586 742
PassMark - G3D Mark 14699 11403
Geekbench - OpenCL 90578 186736
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 18454 13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 18454 13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3714 7164
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3714 7164
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3355 30936
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3355 30936
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 171.616
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 4031.404
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 16.925
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 247.788
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1195.863

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

Essentials

Architecture Turing GCN 5.0
Code name TU104 Vega 10
Launch date 27 May 2019 13 August 2018
Place in performance rating 52 9
Type Laptop Workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $999
Price now $999
Value for money (0-100) 13.37

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1350 MHz 1530 MHz
Core clock speed 600 MHz 1200 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 14 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 259.2 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 16.59 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 8.294 TFLOPS
Pipelines 3072
Pixel fill rate 86.40 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 259.2 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 80 Watt 230 Watt
Transistor count 13600 million 12,500 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 4x mini-DisplayPort

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Width IGP
Length 267 mm

API support

OpenCL 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.4
Vulkan
DirectX 12.0 (12_1)

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 16 GB
Memory clock speed 2000 MHz