NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- 2x more pipelines: 3072 vs 1536
- 2.7x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 6144 MB
- Around 45% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 705 vs 487
- Around 45% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14832 vs 10205
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19565 vs 16828
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19565 vs 16828
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 23 April 2019 |
| Pipelines | 3072 vs 1536 |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 6144 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 705 vs 487 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 14832 vs 10205 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19565 vs 16828 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19565 vs 16828 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
- Around 41% higher core clock speed: 1455 MHz vs 1035 MHz
- Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 1590 MHz vs 1545 MHz
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8054 vs 3346
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8054 vs 3346
- 4.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 15109 vs 3714
- 4.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 15109 vs 3714
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1455 MHz vs 1035 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1590 MHz vs 1545 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8054 vs 3346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8054 vs 3346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 15109 vs 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 15109 vs 3714 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 705 | 487 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 14832 | 10205 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19565 | 16828 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19565 | 16828 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 8054 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 8054 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 15109 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 15109 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 5570 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Code name | TU104 | N18E-G0 |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 23 April 2019 |
| Place in performance rating | 175 | 117 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1545 MHz | 1590 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1035 MHz | 1455 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 296.6 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 18.98 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.492 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 3072 | 1536 |
| Pixel fill rate | 98.88 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 296.6 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 13600 million | 6600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | 3.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Width | IGP | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 6144 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 192 bit |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile with others
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon R9 295X2
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 5700
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 64X
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5700 XT
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs
IntelArc A730M
