NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 vs AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 and AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• Around 35% higher core clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 1200 MHz
• Around 21% higher boost clock speed: 1815 MHz vs 1500 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
• Around 15% lower typical power consumption: 200 Watt vs 230 Watt
• 7.4x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1890 MHz
• Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 16063 vs 12844
• Around 63% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 105171 vs 64683
• Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 226.447 vs 174.714
• Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4161.764 vs 3924.968
• Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 25.476 vs 17.305
• Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19811 vs 13848
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3719 vs 3680
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3336
• Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19811 vs 13848
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3719 vs 3680
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3336

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100

• Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 769 vs 749
• Around 48% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 175.219 vs 118.544
• Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1226.861 vs 1106.12

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
GPU 2: AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	16063 12844
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	749 769
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	105171 64683
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	226.447 174.714
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4161.764 3924.968
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	25.476 17.305
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	118.544 175.219
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1106.12 1226.861
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19811 13848
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3719 3680
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3336
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19811 13848
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3719 3680
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3336

Compare specifications (specs)