NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q and AMD Radeon Pro 5500M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q
- Around 23% higher core clock speed: 795 / 1230 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 12% higher boost clock speed: 1455 MHz vs 1300 MHz
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 vs 3670
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 vs 3670
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 795 / 1230 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1455 MHz vs 1300 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 vs 3670 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 vs 3670 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3353 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- 2x more pipelines: 1536 vs 768
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 50% higher memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 8000 MHz
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9175 vs 8878
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9175 vs 8878
- Around 53% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 675 vs 441
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6834 vs 6724
- Around 8% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 36530 vs 33759
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 Nov 2019 vs 27 May 2019 |
| Pipelines | 1536 vs 768 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz vs 8000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9175 vs 8878 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9175 vs 8878 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 675 vs 441 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6834 vs 6724 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 36530 vs 33759 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q | AMD Radeon Pro 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8878 | 9175 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8878 | 9175 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 3670 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 3670 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3353 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 441 | 675 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6724 | 6834 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 33759 | 36530 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 105.82 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1860.146 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.238 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.947 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 596.819 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3426 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q | AMD Radeon Pro 5500M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 1.0 |
| Code name | N19P-Q1 | Navi 14 |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 13 Nov 2019 |
| Place in performance rating | 364 | 365 |
| Type | Mobile Workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1455 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 795 / 1230 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 1536 |
| Compute units | 24 | |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 249.6 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.987 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.994 TFLOPS | |
| Pixel fill rate | 41.60 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 124.8 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 6400 million | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 12000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory bandwidth | 192 GB/s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q with others
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 Max-Q vs
ATIFireGL V8600
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAQuadro K6000
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 Max-Q vs
AMDFirePro S9050
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5500M
