NVIDIA Quadro T1000 vs AMD FirePro W8000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T1000 and AMD FirePro W8000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T1000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 55% higher core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 900 MHz
- 692.9x more texture fill rate: 69.84 GTexel/s vs 100.8 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 7x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 350 Watt
- Around 45% higher memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 5500 MHz
- Around 61% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6599 vs 4096
- Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 87.83 vs 64.628
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9009 vs 7400
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9009 vs 7400
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 14 June 2012 |
| Core clock speed | 1395 MHz vs 900 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 69.84 GTexel/s vs 100.8 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 350 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz vs 5500 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6599 vs 4096 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 87.83 vs 64.628 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9009 vs 7400 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9009 vs 7400 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3357 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W8000
- 2.3x more pipelines: 1792 vs 768
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 464 vs 420
- 2.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 82941 vs 32981
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 1792 vs 768 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 464 vs 420 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 82941 vs 32981 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T1000
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W8000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro T1000 | AMD FirePro W8000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6599 | 4096 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 420 | 464 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 32981 | 82941 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 87.83 | 64.628 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9009 | 7400 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9009 | 7400 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3357 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 387.109 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro T1000 | AMD FirePro W8000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | TU117 | Tahiti |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 14 June 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 391 | 409 |
| Type | Mobile Workstation | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,599 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1455 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 69.84 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 4.470 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.235 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 768 | 1792 |
| Pixel fill rate | 46.56 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 69.84 GTexel/s | 100.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 350 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4700 million | 4,313 million |
| Floating-point performance | 3,226 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI |
| DisplayPort count | 4 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| StereoOutput3D | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Form factor | Full Height / Full Length | |
| Length | 279 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 128 GB/s | 176 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 5500 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro T1000 with others
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 vs
ATIMobility FireGL V5725
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 550v
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7690M
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P2000
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 vs
AMDRadeon Pro 575X
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 5500M
