NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro P1000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro P1000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile

• 1540.5x more texture fill rate: 91.20 GTexel/s vs 59.2 GTexel / s
• 2x more pipelines: 1024 vs 512
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
• 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 18 Watt vs 47 Watt
• Around 73% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7788 vs 4500
• 2.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 40286 vs 15667
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 157.821 vs 71.86
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1934.012 vs 832.248
• 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 10.833 vs 4.039
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 136.552 vs 65.117
• 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 684.333 vs 245.081
• Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9851 vs 6796
• Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9851 vs 6796

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P1000

• Around 48% higher core clock speed: 1266 MHz vs 855 MHz
• Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 1480 MHz vs 1425 MHz
• 4x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective)
• Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 590 vs 483
• Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3702 vs 2476
• Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3348 vs 2238
• Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3702 vs 2476
• Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3348 vs 2238

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P1000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	7788 4500
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	483 590
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	40286 15667
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	157.821 71.86
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1934.012 832.248
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10.833 4.039
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	136.552 65.117
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	684.333 245.081
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9851 6796
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2476 3702
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2238 3348
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9851 6796
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2476 3702
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2238 3348

Compare specifications (specs)