NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile versus NVIDIA Quadro P1000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro P1000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 91.20 GTexel/s versus 59.2 GTexel / s
- 2x plus de pipelines: 1024 versus 512
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 14 nm
- 2.6x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 18 Watt versus 47 Watt
- Environ 73% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 7788 versus 4500
- 2.6x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 40286 versus 15667
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 157.821 versus 71.86
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1934.012 versus 832.248
- 2.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 10.833 versus 4.039
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 136.552 versus 65.117
- 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 684.333 versus 245.081
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9851 versus 6796
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9851 versus 6796
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 91.20 GTexel/s versus 59.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1024 versus 512 |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 14 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt versus 47 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7788 versus 4500 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 40286 versus 15667 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 157.821 versus 71.86 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1934.012 versus 832.248 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.833 versus 4.039 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.552 versus 65.117 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 684.333 versus 245.081 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9851 versus 6796 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9851 versus 6796 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro P1000
- Environ 48% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1266 MHz versus 855 MHz
- Environ 4% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1480 MHz versus 1425 MHz
- 4x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5012 MHz versus 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective)
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 590 versus 483
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3702 versus 2476
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3348 versus 2238
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3702 versus 2476
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3348 versus 2238
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1266 MHz versus 855 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1480 MHz versus 1425 MHz |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz versus 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective) |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 590 versus 483 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3702 versus 2476 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 versus 2238 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3702 versus 2476 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 versus 2238 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P1000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro P1000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7788 | 4500 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 483 | 590 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 40286 | 15667 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 157.821 | 71.86 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1934.012 | 832.248 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.833 | 4.039 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.552 | 65.117 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 684.333 | 245.081 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9851 | 6796 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2476 | 3702 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2238 | 3348 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9851 | 6796 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2476 | 3702 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2238 | 3348 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1591 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro P1000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Nom de code | TU117 | GP107 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 350 | 517 |
| Genre | Laptop | Workstation |
| Date de sortie | 7 February 2017 | |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $375 | |
| Prix maintenant | $319.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 15.53 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1425 MHz | 1480 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 855 MHz | 1266 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 91.20 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5.837 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.918 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 512 |
| Pixel fill rate | 45.60 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 91.20 GTexel/s | 59.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt | 47 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 4700 million | 3,300 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,894 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 145 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 160 GB/s | 80.19 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective) | 5012 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile avec des autres
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon E8870
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
NVIDIATesla P4
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 570X
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5500M
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
NVIDIAT550 Mobile
