NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 18 Watt vs 60 Watt
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7788 vs 7235
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 483 vs 430
- Around 4% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 40286 vs 38863
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9851 vs 9313
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9851 vs 9313
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt vs 60 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7788 vs 7235 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 483 vs 430 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 40286 vs 38863 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9851 vs 9313 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9851 vs 9313 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
- Around 84% higher core clock speed: 1575 MHz vs 855 MHz
- Around 25% higher boost clock speed: 1785 MHz vs 1425 MHz
- Around 25% higher texture fill rate: 114.2 GTexel/s vs 91.20 GTexel/s
- 6.4x more memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective)
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3698 vs 2476
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 2238
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3698 vs 2476
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 2238
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1575 MHz vs 855 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1785 MHz vs 1425 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 114.2 GTexel/s vs 91.20 GTexel/s |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz vs 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 vs 2476 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 2238 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 vs 2476 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 2238 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7788 | 7235 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 483 | 430 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 40286 | 38863 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 157.821 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1934.012 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.833 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.552 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 684.333 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9851 | 9313 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2476 | 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2238 | 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9851 | 9313 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2476 | 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2238 | 3353 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3319 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Code name | TU117 | TU117 |
| Place in performance rating | 350 | 362 |
| Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1425 MHz | 1785 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 855 MHz | 1575 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 91.20 GFLOPS (1:32) | 114.2 GFLOPS |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5.837 TFLOPS (2:1) | 7.311 TFLOPS |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.918 TFLOPS | 3.656 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 1024 |
| Pixel fill rate | 45.60 GPixel/s | 57.12 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 91.20 GTexel/s | 114.2 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt | 60 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4700 million | 4700 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 160 GB/s | 128.0 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective) | 8000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile with others
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon E8870
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
NVIDIATesla P4
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 570X
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5500M
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
NVIDIAT550 Mobile
