NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile und NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
- 3.3x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 18 Watt vs 60 Watt
- Etwa 9% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7837 vs 7160
- Etwa 2% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 460 vs 452
- Etwa 10% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 42927 vs 38863
- Etwa 6% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9851 vs 9313
- Etwa 6% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9851 vs 9313
Spezifikationen | |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 18 Watt vs 60 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7837 vs 7160 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 460 vs 452 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 42927 vs 38863 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9851 vs 9313 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9851 vs 9313 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
- Etwa 84% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1575 MHz vs 855 MHz
- Etwa 25% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1785 MHz vs 1425 MHz
- Etwa 25% höhere Texturfüllrate: 114.2 GTexel/s vs 91.20 GTexel/s
- 6.4x mehr Speichertaktfrequenz: 8000 MHz vs 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective)
- Etwa 49% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3698 vs 2476
- Etwa 50% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 2238
- Etwa 49% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3698 vs 2476
- Etwa 50% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 2238
Spezifikationen | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1575 MHz vs 855 MHz |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1785 MHz vs 1425 MHz |
Texturfüllrate | 114.2 GTexel/s vs 91.20 GTexel/s |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 8000 MHz vs 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 vs 2476 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 2238 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 vs 2476 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 2238 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7837 | 7160 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 460 | 452 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 42927 | 38863 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 157.821 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1934.012 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.833 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.552 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 684.333 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9851 | 9313 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2476 | 3698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2238 | 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9851 | 9313 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2476 | 3698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2238 | 3353 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3319 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Turing | Turing |
Codename | TU117 | TU117 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 353 | 368 |
Typ | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Startdatum | 27 May 2019 | |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1425 MHz | 1785 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 855 MHz | 1575 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 91.20 GFLOPS (1:32) | 114.2 GFLOPS |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5.837 TFLOPS (2:1) | 7.311 TFLOPS |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.918 TFLOPS | 3.656 TFLOPS |
Leitungssysteme | 1024 | 1024 |
Pixel fill rate | 45.60 GPixel/s | 57.12 GPixel/s |
Texturfüllrate | 91.20 GTexel/s | 114.2 GTexel/s |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 18 Watt | 60 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 4700 million | 4700 million |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | No outputs | No outputs |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 1.2 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 160 GB/s | 128.0 GB/s |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective) | 8000 MHz |
Speichertyp | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |