NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile und NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
- 3.3x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 18 Watt vs 60 Watt
- Etwa 8% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7788 vs 7235
- Etwa 12% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 483 vs 430
- Etwa 4% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 40286 vs 38863
- Etwa 6% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9851 vs 9313
- Etwa 6% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9851 vs 9313
| Spezifikationen | |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 18 Watt vs 60 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7788 vs 7235 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 483 vs 430 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 40286 vs 38863 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9851 vs 9313 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9851 vs 9313 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
- Etwa 84% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1575 MHz vs 855 MHz
- Etwa 25% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1785 MHz vs 1425 MHz
- Etwa 25% höhere Texturfüllrate: 114.2 GTexel/s vs 91.20 GTexel/s
- 6.4x mehr Speichertaktfrequenz: 8000 MHz vs 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective)
- Etwa 49% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3698 vs 2476
- Etwa 50% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 2238
- Etwa 49% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3698 vs 2476
- Etwa 50% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 2238
| Spezifikationen | |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 1575 MHz vs 855 MHz |
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1785 MHz vs 1425 MHz |
| Texturfüllrate | 114.2 GTexel/s vs 91.20 GTexel/s |
| Speichertaktfrequenz | 8000 MHz vs 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 vs 2476 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 2238 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 vs 2476 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 2238 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7788 | 7235 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 483 | 430 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 40286 | 38863 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 157.821 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1934.012 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.833 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.552 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 684.333 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9851 | 9313 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2476 | 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2238 | 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9851 | 9313 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2476 | 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2238 | 3353 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3319 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur | Turing | Turing |
| Codename | TU117 | TU117 |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 350 | 362 |
| Typ | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
| Startdatum | 27 May 2019 | |
Technische Info |
||
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1425 MHz | 1785 MHz |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 855 MHz | 1575 MHz |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 91.20 GFLOPS (1:32) | 114.2 GFLOPS |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5.837 TFLOPS (2:1) | 7.311 TFLOPS |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.918 TFLOPS | 3.656 TFLOPS |
| Leitungssysteme | 1024 | 1024 |
| Pixel-Füllrate | 45.60 GPixel/s | 57.12 GPixel/s |
| Texturfüllrate | 91.20 GTexel/s | 114.2 GTexel/s |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 18 Watt | 60 Watt |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 4700 million | 4700 million |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
| Display-Anschlüsse | No outputs | No outputs |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
| Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
API-Unterstützung |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
| Maximale RAM-Belastung | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Speicherbandbreite | 160 GB/s | 128.0 GB/s |
| Breite des Speicherbusses | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Speichertaktfrequenz | 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective) | 8000 MHz |
| Speichertyp | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
