NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile versus NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
- 3.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 18 Watt versus 60 Watt
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 7837 versus 7160
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 460 versus 452
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 42927 versus 38863
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9851 versus 9313
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9851 versus 9313
| Caractéristiques | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt versus 60 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7837 versus 7160 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 460 versus 452 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 42927 versus 38863 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9851 versus 9313 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9851 versus 9313 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
- Environ 84% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1575 MHz versus 855 MHz
- Environ 25% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1785 MHz versus 1425 MHz
- Environ 25% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 114.2 GTexel/s versus 91.20 GTexel/s
- 6.4x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 8000 MHz versus 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective)
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3698 versus 2476
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 versus 2238
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3698 versus 2476
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 versus 2238
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1575 MHz versus 855 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1785 MHz versus 1425 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 114.2 GTexel/s versus 91.20 GTexel/s |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 8000 MHz versus 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective) |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 versus 2476 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 versus 2238 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 versus 2476 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 versus 2238 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7837 | 7160 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 460 | 452 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 42927 | 38863 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 157.821 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1934.012 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.833 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.552 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 684.333 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9851 | 9313 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2476 | 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2238 | 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9851 | 9313 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2476 | 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2238 | 3353 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3319 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Nom de code | TU117 | TU117 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 353 | 368 |
| Genre | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
| Date de sortie | 27 May 2019 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1425 MHz | 1785 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 855 MHz | 1575 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 91.20 GFLOPS (1:32) | 114.2 GFLOPS |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5.837 TFLOPS (2:1) | 7.311 TFLOPS |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.918 TFLOPS | 3.656 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 1024 |
| Pixel fill rate | 45.60 GPixel/s | 57.12 GPixel/s |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 91.20 GTexel/s | 114.2 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt | 60 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 4700 million | 4700 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 160 GB/s | 128.0 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective) | 8000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile avec des autres
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
ATIFireGL V7700
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon HD 7730
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
NVIDIATesla M6
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGRID M60-8Q
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
NVIDIATesla P4
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5300M
