NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon HD 7970
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q and AMD Radeon HD 7970 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 75% higher boost clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 925 MHz
- 875.8x more texture fill rate: 103.7 GTexel/s vs 118.4 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 7.5x lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 300 Watt
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 3 GB
- Around 45% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective) vs 1375 MHz
- Around 20% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 41349 vs 34541
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 22 December 2011 |
| Boost clock speed | 1620 MHz vs 925 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 103.7 GTexel/s vs 118.4 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt vs 300 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 3 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective) vs 1375 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3350 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 41349 vs 34541 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7970
- 2x more pipelines: 2048 vs 1024
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9448 vs 7682
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9448 vs 7682
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 2048 vs 1024 |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9448 vs 7682 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9448 vs 7682 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3704 vs 3703 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3704 vs 3703 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7970
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q | AMD Radeon HD 7970 |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7682 | 9448 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7682 | 9448 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3703 | 3704 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3703 | 3704 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3350 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 41349 | 34541 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 430 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6923 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 84.381 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1389.754 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.872 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 101.929 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 481.76 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2276 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q | AMD Radeon HD 7970 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | TU117 | Tahiti |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 22 December 2011 |
| Place in performance rating | 381 | 483 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $549 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1620 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1200 MHz | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 103.7 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 6.636 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.318 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 2048 |
| Pixel fill rate | 51.84 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 103.7 GTexel/s | 118.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | 300 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4700 million | 4,313 million |
| Floating-point performance | 3,789 gflops | |
| Stream Processors | 2048 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Width | IGP | |
| Bus support | PCIe 2.1 x16 | |
| Length | 274 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 11 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 3 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 128.0 GB/s | 264 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective) | 1375 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| FreeSync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q with others
NVIDIAQuadro T2000 Max-Q vs
ATIRadeon X1900 GT
NVIDIAQuadro T2000 Max-Q vs
ATIRadeon HD 2900 PRO
NVIDIAQuadro T2000 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon R9 280X
NVIDIAQuadro T2000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAQuadro P3000
NVIDIAQuadro T2000 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon RX 5300M
NVIDIAQuadro T2000 Max-Q vs
IntelArc A370M
