NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
776.2x more texture fill rate: 103.7 GTexel/s vs 133.6 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
3x lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 120 Watt
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3703 vs 3654
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3703 vs 3654
Around 32% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 41046 vs 31098

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	27 May 2019 vs 15 August 2016
Texture fill rate	103.7 GTexel/s vs 133.6 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm vs 16 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	40 Watt vs 120 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3703 vs 3654
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3703 vs 3654
Geekbench - OpenCL	41046 vs 31098

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)

Around 26% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 1200 MHz
Around 5% higher boost clock speed: 1708 MHz vs 1620 MHz
Around 25% higher pipelines: 1280 vs 1024
Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
4x more memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective)
Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12645 vs 7682
Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12645 vs 7682
Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 444 vs 405
Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8160 vs 6871

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1506 MHz vs 1200 MHz
Boost clock speed	1708 MHz vs 1620 MHz
Pipelines	1280 vs 1024
Maximum memory size	6 GB vs 4 GB
Memory clock speed	8008 MHz vs 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective)
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	12645 vs 7682
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	12645 vs 7682
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3359 vs 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3359 vs 3356
PassMark - G2D Mark	444 vs 405
PassMark - G3D Mark	8160 vs 6871

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

7682

12645

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

7682

12645

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3703

3654

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3703

3654

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3356

3359

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3356

3359

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

41046

31098

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

405

444

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

6871

8160

Name	NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	7682	12645
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	7682	12645
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3703	3654
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3703	3654
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3356	3359
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3356	3359
Geekbench - OpenCL	41046	31098
PassMark - G2D Mark	405	444
PassMark - G3D Mark	6871	8160
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		111.55
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		1371.266
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		8.49
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		19.803
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		509.222
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		3677

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Essentials
Architecture	Turing	Pascal
Code name	TU117	GP106B
Launch date	27 May 2019	15 August 2016
Place in performance rating	395	385
Type	Laptop	Laptop
Launch price (MSRP)		$237.11
Price now		$229.99
Value for money (0-100)		49.49
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1620 MHz	1708 MHz
Core clock speed	1200 MHz	1506 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	16 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	103.7 GFLOPS (1:32)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	6.636 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	3.318 TFLOPS
Pipelines	1024	1280
Pixel fill rate	51.84 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	103.7 GTexel/s	133.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	40 Watt	120 Watt
Transistor count	4700 million	4,400 million
CUDA cores		1280
Floating-point performance		4,275 gflops
Maximum GPU temperature		94 °C
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	DP 1.43, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI
G-SYNC support
HDCP
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None
Width	IGP
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
Laptop size		large
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model	6.5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	6 GB
Memory bandwidth	128.0 GB/s	192 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective)	8008 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
3D Vision
Ansel
CUDA
DSR
GameStream
GPU Boost
Multi Monitor
Multi-Projection
ShadowWorks
Surround
Virtual Reality
VR Ready