NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro P2000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• Around 46% higher core clock speed: 1575 MHz vs 1076 MHz
• Around 21% higher boost clock speed: 1785 MHz vs 1480 MHz
• 1205.7x more texture fill rate: 114.2 GTexel/s vs 94.72 GTexel / s
• Around 33% higher pipelines: 1024 vs 768
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
• Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 75 Watt
• Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 7008 MHz
• Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7159 vs 6923
• Around 69% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 38863 vs 22948
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 3316
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 3316
• Around 12% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3319 vs 2958

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2000

• Around 25% higher maximum memory size: 5 GB vs 4 GB
• Around 42% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 635 vs 448
• Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10251 vs 9313
• Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10251 vs 9313

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P2000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	7159 6923
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	448 635
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	38863 22948
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9313 10251
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3698 3681
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3353 3316
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9313 10251
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3698 3681
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3353 3316
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	3319 2958

Compare specifications (specs)