NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs AMD FirePro S9050

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile and AMD FirePro S9050 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

AMD FirePro S9050

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 9 month(s) later
Around 75% higher core clock speed: 1575 MHz vs 900 MHz
1132.9x more texture fill rate: 114.2 GTexel/s vs 100.8 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
3.8x lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 225 Watt
Around 45% higher memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 5500 MHz
Around 46% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7164 vs 4901
Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 448 vs 369
Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9313 vs 7062
Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9313 vs 7062

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	27 May 2019 vs 7 August 2014
Core clock speed	1575 MHz vs 900 MHz
Texture fill rate	114.2 GTexel/s vs 100.8 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	60 Watt vs 225 Watt
Memory clock speed	8000 MHz vs 5500 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	7164 vs 4901
PassMark - G2D Mark	448 vs 369
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	9313 vs 7062
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	9313 vs 7062

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro S9050

Around 75% higher pipelines: 1792 vs 1024
3x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 4 GB
Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6260 vs 3698
3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 13032 vs 3353
Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6260 vs 3698
3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 13032 vs 3353

Specifications (specs)
Pipelines	1792 vs 1024
Maximum memory size	12 GB vs 4 GB
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	6260 vs 3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	13032 vs 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	6260 vs 3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	13032 vs 3353

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD FirePro S9050

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

7164

4901

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

448

369

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9313

7062

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3698

6260

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3353

13032

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9313

7062

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3698

6260

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3353

13032

Name	NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile	AMD FirePro S9050
PassMark - G3D Mark	7164	4901
PassMark - G2D Mark	448	369
Geekbench - OpenCL	38863
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	9313	7062
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3698	6260
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3353	13032
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	9313	7062
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3698	6260
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3353	13032
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	3319
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		68.324
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		1463.376
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		6.491
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		91.133
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		344.551

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile	AMD FirePro S9050
Essentials
Architecture	Turing	GCN 1.0
Code name	TU117	Tahiti
Launch date	27 May 2019	7 August 2014
Place in performance rating	378	374
Type	Mobile workstation	Workstation
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1785 MHz
Core clock speed	1575 MHz	900 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	114.2 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	7.311 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	3.656 TFLOPS
Pipelines	1024	1792
Pixel fill rate	57.12 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	114.2 GTexel/s	100.8 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	60 Watt	225 Watt
Transistor count	4700 million	4,313 million
Floating-point performance		3,226 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DisplayPort
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
Form factor		Full Height / Full Length
Length		254 mm
Supplementary power connectors		1x 8-pin
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.0 (11_1)
OpenCL	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	12 GB
Memory bandwidth	128.0 GB/s	264 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	8000 MHz	5500 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5