NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon RX 6600
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation and AMD Radeon RX 6600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation
- Around 38% higher texture fill rate: 386.3 GTexel/s vs 279.0 GTexel/s
- 4.1x more pipelines: 7424 vs 1792
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 5 nm vs 7 nm
- Around 20% lower typical power consumption: 110 Watt vs 132 Watt
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 29% higher memory clock speed: 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
- Around 50% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 22747 vs 15146
- 2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 146342 vs 72643
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 386.3 GTexel/s vs 279.0 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 7424 vs 1792 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm vs 7 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt vs 132 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 8 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 22747 vs 15146 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 146342 vs 72643 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6600
- Around 26% higher core clock speed: 1626 MHz vs 1290 MHz
- Around 50% higher boost clock speed: 2491 MHz vs 1665 MHz
- Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 875 vs 739
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1626 MHz vs 1290 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2491 MHz vs 1665 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 875 vs 739 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 6600
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation | AMD Radeon RX 6600 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 739 | 875 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 22747 | 15146 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 146342 | 72643 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 260.061 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5472.868 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 20.421 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 290.312 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1152.228 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19713 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 26778 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 69225 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19713 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 26778 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 69225 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8083 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation | AMD Radeon RX 6600 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 2.0 |
| Code name | AD104 | Navi 23 XL |
| Place in performance rating | 43 | 40 |
| Launch date | 13 Oct 2021 | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $329 | |
| Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1665 MHz | 2491 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1290 MHz | 1626 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Pipelines | 7424 | 1792 |
| Pixel fill rate | 133.2 GPixel/s | 159.4 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 386.3 GTexel/s | 279.0 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt | 132 Watt |
| Transistor count | 35800 million | 11060 million |
| Compute units | 28 | |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 558.0 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 17.86 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.928 TFLOPS | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort count | 3 | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | IGP | Dual-slot |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Height | 40 mm (1.6 inches) | |
| Length | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 300 Watt | |
| Width | 110 mm (4.3 inches) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 432.0 GB/s | 224 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 192 bit | 128 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation with others
NVIDIARTX 4000 Ada Generation vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3070
NVIDIARTX 4000 Ada Generation vs
AMDRadeon RX 6600
NVIDIARTX 4000 Ada Generation vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 8GB
NVIDIARTX 4000 Ada Generation vs
NVIDIARTX A4500
NVIDIARTX 4000 Ada Generation vs
NVIDIARTX 2000 Ada Generation
NVIDIARTX 4000 Ada Generation vs
NVIDIARTX 5000 Ada Generation
