NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation and AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation
- 6x more pipelines: 15360 vs 2560
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 5 nm vs 7 nm
- 2.7x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 12 GB
- Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 2500 MHz, 20 Gbps effective vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
- Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 23812 vs 19877
- Around 17% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 115321 vs 98691
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 15360 vs 2560 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm vs 7 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 12 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz, 20 Gbps effective vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 23812 vs 19877 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 115321 vs 98691 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
- 2.5x more core clock speed: 2321 MHz vs 915 MHz
- Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 2581 MHz vs 2505 MHz
- 343.6x more texture fill rate: 413.0 GTexel/s vs 1,202 GTexel/s
- Around 30% lower typical power consumption: 230 Watt vs 300 Watt
- Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 939 vs 704
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 2321 MHz vs 915 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2581 MHz vs 2505 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 413.0 GTexel/s vs 1,202 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 230 Watt vs 300 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 939 vs 704 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation | AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 704 | 939 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 23812 | 19877 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 115321 | 98691 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 349.422 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7129.567 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 34.064 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 197.183 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1699.337 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15315 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 18062 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 50772 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15315 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 18062 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 50772 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 12779 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation | AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 2.0 |
| Code name | AD102 | Navi 22 |
| Place in performance rating | 50 | 49 |
| Launch date | 3 Mar 2021 | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $479 | |
| Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2505 MHz | 2581 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 915 MHz | 2321 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Pipelines | 15360 | 2560 |
| Pixel fill rate | 440.9 GPixel/s | 165.2 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 1,202 GTexel/s | 413.0 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 230 Watt |
| Transistor count | 76300 million | 17200 million |
| Compute units | 40 | |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 825.9 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 26.43 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 13.21 TFLOPS | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Dual-slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm, 10.5 inches | 267 mm (10.5 inches) |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 700 Watt | 550 Watt |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 16-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Width | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | 110 mm (4.3 inches) |
| Height | 40 mm (1.6 inches) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 960.0 GB/s | 384 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 384 bit | 192 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz, 20 Gbps effective | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation with others
NVIDIARTX 5000 Ada Generation vs
AMDRadeon RX 6700 XT
NVIDIARTX 5000 Ada Generation vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3070 Mobile
NVIDIARTX 5000 Ada Generation vs
NVIDIAA40
NVIDIARTX 5000 Ada Generation vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 12GB GA104
NVIDIARTX 5000 Ada Generation vs
NVIDIARTX A1000 Embedded
NVIDIARTX 5000 Ada Generation vs
NVIDIARTX 5000 Ada Generation 16GB
