NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation
- Around 48% higher boost clock speed: 2505 MHz vs 1695 MHz
- Around 46% higher pipelines: 15360 vs 10496
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 5 nm vs 8 nm
- Around 17% lower typical power consumption: 300 Watt vs 350 Watt
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 24 GB
- 2.1x more memory clock speed: 2500 MHz, 20 Gbps effective vs 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective)
| Boost clock speed | 2505 MHz vs 1695 MHz |
| Pipelines | 15360 vs 10496 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm vs 8 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt vs 350 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 24 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz, 20 Gbps effective vs 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
- Around 52% higher core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 915 MHz
- 462.6x more texture fill rate: 556.0 GTexel/s vs 1,202 GTexel/s
- Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1050 vs 754
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 26732 vs 24202
- Around 57% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 191377 vs 121824
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1395 MHz vs 915 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 556.0 GTexel/s vs 1,202 GTexel/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1050 vs 754 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 26732 vs 24202 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 191377 vs 121824 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 754 | 1050 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 24202 | 26732 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 121824 | 191377 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 732.196 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7585.258 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 63.011 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 247.569 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2441.384 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 33398 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 33398 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 19948 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ampere |
| Code name | AD102 | GA102 |
| Place in performance rating | 47 | 44 |
| Launch date | 1 Sep 2020 | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1499 | |
| Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2505 MHz | 1695 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 915 MHz | 1395 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 8 nm |
| Pipelines | 15360 | 10496 |
| Pixel fill rate | 440.9 GPixel/s | 189.8 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 1,202 GTexel/s | 556.0 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 350 Watt |
| Transistor count | 76300 million | 28300 million |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 556.0 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 35.58 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 35.58 TFLOPS | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Dual-slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm, 10.5 inches | 313 mm (12.3 inches) |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 700 Watt | 750 Watt |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 16-pin | 1x 12-pin |
| Width | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | Triple-slot |
| Height | 138 mm (5.4 inches) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 24 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 960.0 GB/s | 936.2 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 384 bit | 384 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz, 20 Gbps effective | 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation with others
NVIDIARTX 5000 Ada Generation vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3070
NVIDIARTX 5000 Ada Generation vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3090
NVIDIARTX 5000 Ada Generation vs
AMDRadeon RX 6700 XT
NVIDIARTX 5000 Ada Generation vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3070 Mobile
NVIDIARTX 5000 Ada Generation vs
NVIDIARTX 2000 Ada Generation
NVIDIARTX 5000 Ada Generation vs
NVIDIARTX 5000 Ada Generation 16GB
