NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro P5200
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro P5200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
- Around 16% higher boost clock speed: 1815 MHz vs 1569 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 5% lower typical power consumption: 95 Watt vs 100 Watt
- Around 45% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 56685 vs 38994
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Boost clock speed | 1815 MHz vs 1569 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt vs 100 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 56685 vs 38994 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P5200
- Around 79% higher core clock speed: 1316 MHz vs 735 MHz
- Around 92% higher texture fill rate: 279.4 GTexel/s vs 145.2 GTexel/s
- 4x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz (7200 MHz effective) vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15910 vs 12750
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15910 vs 12750
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1316 MHz vs 735 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 279.4 GTexel/s vs 145.2 GTexel/s |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 4 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz (7200 MHz effective) vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15910 vs 12750 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 vs 3708 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15910 vs 12750 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 vs 3708 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3355 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P5200
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9814 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 493 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 56685 | 38994 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 202.984 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2138.158 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.498 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 151.433 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 729.947 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12750 | 15910 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 | 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12750 | 15910 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 | 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3357 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6252 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro P5200 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
| Code name | GA106 | GP104 |
| Place in performance rating | 272 | 273 |
| Launch date | 21 February 2018 | |
| Type | Mobile workstation | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1815 MHz | 1569 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 735 MHz | 1316 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 16 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 145.2 GFLOPS (1:64) | 279.4 GFLOPS |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 9.293 TFLOPS (1:1) | 139.7 GFLOPS |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.293 TFLOPS | 8.940 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 2560 |
| Pixel fill rate | 87.12 GPixel/s | 111.7 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 145.2 GTexel/s | 279.4 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13250 million | 7200 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Laptop size | Large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 230.4 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) | 1800 MHz (7200 MHz effective) |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile with others
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon HD 6610M
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro P3200 Max-Q
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIATesla V100 SXM2 32 GB
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIATesla T4
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro P5200
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti
