NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 4096 vs 3072
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 15% lower typical power consumption: 130 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20429 vs 20291
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20429 vs 20291
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 vs 3652
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 vs 3652
- 57.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 58
- 57.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 58
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 4096 vs 3072 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 12 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt vs 150 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20429 vs 20291 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20429 vs 20291 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 vs 3652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 vs 3652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 58 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 58 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile
- Around 26% higher core clock speed: 1365 MHz vs 1080 MHz
- Around 50% higher texture fill rate: 299.5 GTexel/s vs 199.7 GTexel/s
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 17% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)
| Core clock speed | 1365 MHz vs 1080 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 299.5 GTexel/s vs 199.7 GTexel/s |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 518 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12546 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20429 | 20291 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20429 | 20291 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 | 3652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 | 3652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 58 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 58 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 78491 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10255 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
| Code name | GA104 | TU104 |
| Place in performance rating | 179 | 182 |
| Launch date | 2 Apr 2020 | |
| Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz | 1560 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1080 MHz | 1365 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 199.7 GFLOPS (1:64) | 299.5 GFLOPS (1:32) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 12.78 TFLOPS (1:1) | 19.17 TFLOPS (2:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 12.78 TFLOPS | 9.585 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 4096 | 3072 |
| Pixel fill rate | 99.84 GPixel/s | 99.84 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 199.7 GTexel/s | 299.5 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Transistor count | 17400 million | 13600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 288 GB/s | 448.0 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 192 bit | 256 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile with others
NVIDIARTX A3000 Mobile vs
NVIDIATesla P100 PCIe 12 GB
NVIDIARTX A3000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
NVIDIARTX A3000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIARTX A3000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega II Duo
NVIDIARTX A3000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile
NVIDIARTX A3000 Mobile vs
AppleM1 Ultra 48-core
