NVIDIA RTX A5000 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A5000 and AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A5000

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• Around 17% higher core clock speed: 1170 MHz vs 1002 MHz
• Around 61% higher boost clock speed: 1695 MHz vs 1053 MHz
• 7358x more texture fill rate: 433.9 GTexel/s vs 58.97 GTexel / s
• 9.1x more pipelines: 8192 vs 896
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 14 nm
• 6x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 4 GB
• 8.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 22553 vs 2728
• 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1032 vs 406
• 3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 154729 vs 51217
• 12.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 581.432 vs 46.158
• 7.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 6836.931 vs 876.241
• 13.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 54.372 vs 3.983
• 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 191.518 vs 64.599
• 10.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2038.811 vs 194.258
• 6.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22508 vs 3301
• Around 78% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 vs 2086
• 6.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22508 vs 3301
• Around 78% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 vs 2086

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile

• 4.6x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 230 Watt
• 3x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
• Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6466 vs 3355
• Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6466 vs 3355

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A5000
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	22553 2728
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1032 406
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	154729 51217
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	581.432 46.158
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6836.931 876.241
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	54.372 3.983
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	191.518 64.599
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2038.811 194.258
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	22508 3301
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3714 2086
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3355 6466
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	22508 3301
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3714 2086
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3355 6466

Compare specifications (specs)