NVIDIA RTX A5000 versus AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA RTX A5000 and AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA RTX A5000
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 17% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1170 MHz versus 1002 MHz
- Environ 61% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1695 MHz versus 1053 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 433.9 GTexel/s versus 58.97 GTexel / s
- 9.1x plus de pipelines: 8192 versus 896
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 14 nm
- 6x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 24 GB versus 4 GB
- 8.3x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 22553 versus 2728
- 2.5x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 1032 versus 406
- 3x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 154729 versus 51217
- 12.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 581.432 versus 46.158
- 7.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 6836.931 versus 876.241
- 13.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 54.372 versus 3.983
- 3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 191.518 versus 64.599
- 10.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2038.811 versus 194.258
- 6.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22508 versus 3301
- Environ 78% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 versus 2086
- 6.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22508 versus 3301
- Environ 78% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 versus 2086
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 12 Apr 2021 versus 1 March 2017 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1170 MHz versus 1002 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1695 MHz versus 1053 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 433.9 GTexel/s versus 58.97 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 8192 versus 896 |
| Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 14 nm |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 24 GB versus 4 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 22553 versus 2728 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1032 versus 406 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 154729 versus 51217 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 581.432 versus 46.158 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6836.931 versus 876.241 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 54.372 versus 3.983 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 191.518 versus 64.599 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2038.811 versus 194.258 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22508 versus 3301 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 versus 2086 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22508 versus 3301 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 versus 2086 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile
- 4.6x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 50 Watt versus 230 Watt
- 3x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 6000 MHz versus 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
- Environ 93% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6466 versus 3355
- Environ 93% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6466 versus 3355
| Caractéristiques | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt versus 230 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6000 MHz versus 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6466 versus 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6466 versus 3355 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A5000
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA RTX A5000 | AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 22553 | 2728 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1032 | 406 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 154729 | 51217 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 581.432 | 46.158 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6836.931 | 876.241 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 54.372 | 3.983 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 191.518 | 64.599 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2038.811 | 194.258 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22508 | 3301 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 2086 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 6466 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22508 | 3301 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 2086 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 6466 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA RTX A5000 | AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 4.0 |
| Nom de code | GA102 | Baffin |
| Date de sortie | 12 Apr 2021 | 1 March 2017 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 69 | 639 |
| Genre | Workstation | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1695 MHz | 1053 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1170 MHz | 1002 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 867.8 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 27.77 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 27.77 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 8192 | 896 |
| Pixel fill rate | 162.7 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 433.9 GTexel/s | 58.97 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 230 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 28300 million | 3,000 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,887 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Longeur | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | |
| Largeur | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 24 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 768 GB/s | 112.0 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 384 bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 6000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA RTX A5000 avec des autres
NVIDIARTX A5000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6800 XT
NVIDIARTX A5000 vs
AMDRadeon Pro V520
NVIDIARTX A5000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3070 Ti
NVIDIARTX A5000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
NVIDIARTX A5000 vs
NVIDIARTX A1000 Embedded
NVIDIARTX A5000 vs
NVIDIARTX A5500 Mobile
