NVIDIA RTX A5000 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A5000 and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A5000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 13% higher core clock speed: 1170 MHz vs 1035 MHz
- Around 10% higher boost clock speed: 1695 MHz vs 1545 MHz
- Around 46% higher texture fill rate: 433.9 GTexel/s vs 296.6 GTexel/s
- 2.7x more pipelines: 8192 vs 3072
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 16 GB
- Around 52% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 22553 vs 14832
- Around 46% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1032 vs 705
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22508 vs 19565
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22508 vs 19565
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 Apr 2021 vs 27 May 2019 |
Core clock speed | 1170 MHz vs 1035 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1695 MHz vs 1545 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 433.9 GTexel/s vs 296.6 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 8192 vs 3072 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 12 nm |
Maximum memory size | 24 GB vs 16 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22553 vs 14832 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1032 vs 705 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22508 vs 19565 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 3346 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22508 vs 19565 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 3346 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 110 Watt vs 230 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt vs 230 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A5000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA RTX A5000 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22553 | 14832 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1032 | 705 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 154729 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 581.432 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6836.931 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 54.372 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 191.518 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2038.811 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22508 | 19565 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3346 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22508 | 19565 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3346 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA RTX A5000 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
Code name | GA102 | TU104 |
Launch date | 12 Apr 2021 | 27 May 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 69 | 188 |
Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1695 MHz | 1545 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1170 MHz | 1035 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 867.8 GFLOPS (1:32) | 296.6 GFLOPS |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 27.77 TFLOPS (1:1) | 18.98 TFLOPS |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 27.77 TFLOPS | 9.492 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 8192 | 3072 |
Pixel fill rate | 162.7 GPixel/s | 98.88 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 433.9 GTexel/s | 296.6 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 230 Watt | 110 Watt |
Transistor count | 28300 million | 13600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
Width | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | IGP |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 1.2 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 24 GB | 16 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 768 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 384 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |