NVIDIA RTX A5000 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A5000 and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A5000

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• Around 16% higher core clock speed: 1170 MHz vs 1005 MHz
• Around 41% higher boost clock speed: 1695 MHz vs 1200 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
• Around 9% lower typical power consumption: 230 Watt vs 250 Watt
• Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 22553 vs 19862
• Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1032 vs 880
• Around 5% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 154729 vs 147317
• Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 581.432 vs 401.574
• Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 6836.931 vs 6432.348
• Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 54.372 vs 43.914
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22508 vs 21578
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 vs 3652
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 vs 3290
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22508 vs 21578
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 vs 3652
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 vs 3290

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000

• 7x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
• Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 215.219 vs 191.518
• Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2101.927 vs 2038.811

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A5000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	22553 19862
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1032 880
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	154729 147317
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	581.432 401.574
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6836.931 6432.348
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	54.372 43.914
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	191.518 215.219
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2038.811 2101.927
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	22508 21578
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3714 3652
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3355 3290
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	22508 21578
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3714 3652
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3355 3290

Compare specifications (specs)