NVIDIA RTX A5000 vs NVIDIA TITAN V
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A5000 and NVIDIA TITAN V videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A5000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 16% higher boost clock speed: 1695 MHz vs 1455 MHz
- 931.9x more texture fill rate: 433.9 GTexel/s vs 465.6 GTexel / s
- Around 60% higher pipelines: 8192 vs 5120
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 9% lower typical power consumption: 230 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 12 GB
- Around 18% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1700 MHz
- Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 22901 vs 19884
- Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1038 vs 868
- Around 3% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 154651 vs 150662
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 581.432 vs 270.561
- Around 91% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 6836.931 vs 3583.136
- Around 76% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 54.372 vs 30.857
- 9.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 191.518 vs 20.669
- Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2038.811 vs 1504.373
- Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22508 vs 15401
- Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22508 vs 15401
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 Apr 2021 vs 7 December 2017 |
Boost clock speed | 1695 MHz vs 1455 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 433.9 GTexel/s vs 465.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 8192 vs 5120 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 12 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 230 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 24 GB vs 12 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1700 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22901 vs 19884 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1038 vs 868 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 154651 vs 150662 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 581.432 vs 270.561 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6836.931 vs 3583.136 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 54.372 vs 30.857 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 191.518 vs 20.669 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2038.811 vs 1504.373 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22508 vs 15401 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22508 vs 15401 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA TITAN V
- Around 3% higher core clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1170 MHz
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4193 vs 3355
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4193 vs 3355
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 1170 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 vs 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4193 vs 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 vs 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4193 vs 3355 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A5000
GPU 2: NVIDIA TITAN V
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA RTX A5000 | NVIDIA TITAN V |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22901 | 19884 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1038 | 868 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 154651 | 150662 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 581.432 | 270.561 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6836.931 | 3583.136 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 54.372 | 30.857 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 191.518 | 20.669 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2038.811 | 1504.373 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22508 | 15401 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 4193 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22508 | 15401 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 4193 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 13111 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA RTX A5000 | NVIDIA TITAN V | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Volta |
Code name | GA102 | GV100 |
Launch date | 12 Apr 2021 | 7 December 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 65 | 149 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $2,999 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1695 MHz | 1455 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1170 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 867.8 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 27.77 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 27.77 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 8192 | 5120 |
Pixel fill rate | 162.7 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 433.9 GTexel/s | 465.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 230 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 28300 million | 21,100 million |
Floating-point performance | 14,899 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 267 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Width | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 24 GB | 12 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 768 GB/s | 652.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 bit | 3072 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 1700 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |