NVIDIA T400 vs Intel UHD Graphics 770

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA T400 and Intel UHD Graphics 770 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA T400

  • Around 40% higher core clock speed: 420 MHz vs 300 MHz
  • Around 47% higher texture fill rate: 34.20 GTexel/s vs 23.20 GTexel/s
  • Around 50% higher pipelines: 384 vs 256
  • 2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 17019 vs 7628
  • Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 58.805 vs 46.442
  • Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.961 vs 2.846
  • Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 53.111 vs 40.941
  • 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 222.15 vs 94.384
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 420 MHz vs 300 MHz
Texture fill rate 34.20 GTexel/s vs 23.20 GTexel/s
Pipelines 384 vs 256
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 17019 vs 7628
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 58.805 vs 46.442
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.961 vs 2.846
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 53.111 vs 40.941
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 222.15 vs 94.384

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 770

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
  • Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1450 MHz vs 1425 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 12 nm
  • 2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 30 Watt
  • Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1011.7 vs 785.059
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 4 Nov 2021 vs 6 May 2021
Boost clock speed 1450 MHz vs 1425 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 10 nm vs 12 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 30 Watt
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1011.7 vs 785.059

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA T400
GPU 2: Intel UHD Graphics 770

Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
17019
7628
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
58.805
46.442
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
785.059
1011.7
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3.961
2.846
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
53.111
40.941
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
222.15
94.384
Name NVIDIA T400 Intel UHD Graphics 770
Geekbench - OpenCL 17019 7628
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 58.805 46.442
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 785.059 1011.7
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.961 2.846
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 53.111 40.941
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 222.15 94.384
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 5088
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2173
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3346
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 5088
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2173
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3346
PassMark - G2D Mark 532
PassMark - G3D Mark 1908
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 72

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA T400 Intel UHD Graphics 770

Essentials

Architecture Turing Generation 12.2
Code name TU117 Alder Lake GT1
Launch date 6 May 2021 4 Nov 2021
Place in performance rating 851 832
Type Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1425 MHz 1450 MHz
Core clock speed 420 MHz 300 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 10 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 34.20 GFLOPS (1:32) 185.6 GFLOPS (1:4)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 2.189 TFLOPS (2:1) 1485 GFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 1,094 GFLOPS 742.4 GFLOPS
Pipelines 384 256
Pixel fill rate 22.80 GPixel/s 11.60 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 34.20 GTexel/s 23.20 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 30 Watt 15 Watt
Transistor count 4700 million
Compute units 32

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Form factor Single-slot
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16
Recommended system power (PSU) 200 Watt
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12 (12_1) 12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL 3.0 3.0
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.7 (6.4) 6.4
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 80.00 GB/s
Memory bus width 64 bit
Memory clock speed 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective
Memory type GDDR6