NVIDIA T400 vs Intel UHD Graphics 770
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA T400 and Intel UHD Graphics 770 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA T400
- Around 40% higher core clock speed: 420 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 47% higher texture fill rate: 34.20 GTexel/s vs 23.20 GTexel/s
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 384 vs 256
- 2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 17019 vs 7628
- Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 58.805 vs 46.442
- Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.961 vs 2.846
- Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 53.111 vs 40.941
- 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 222.15 vs 94.384
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 420 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 34.20 GTexel/s vs 23.20 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 384 vs 256 |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17019 vs 7628 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 58.805 vs 46.442 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.961 vs 2.846 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.111 vs 40.941 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 222.15 vs 94.384 |
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 770
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1450 MHz vs 1425 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 12 nm
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 30 Watt
- Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1011.7 vs 785.059
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 4 Nov 2021 vs 6 May 2021 |
Boost clock speed | 1450 MHz vs 1425 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 12 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 30 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1011.7 vs 785.059 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA T400
GPU 2: Intel UHD Graphics 770
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA T400 | Intel UHD Graphics 770 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17019 | 7628 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 58.805 | 46.442 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 785.059 | 1011.7 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.961 | 2.846 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.111 | 40.941 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 222.15 | 94.384 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5088 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2173 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5088 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2173 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 532 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1908 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 72 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA T400 | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Generation 12.2 |
Code name | TU117 | Alder Lake GT1 |
Launch date | 6 May 2021 | 4 Nov 2021 |
Place in performance rating | 851 | 832 |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1425 MHz | 1450 MHz |
Core clock speed | 420 MHz | 300 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 10 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 34.20 GFLOPS (1:32) | 185.6 GFLOPS (1:4) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 2.189 TFLOPS (2:1) | 1485 GFLOPS (2:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1,094 GFLOPS | 742.4 GFLOPS |
Pipelines | 384 | 256 |
Pixel fill rate | 22.80 GPixel/s | 11.60 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 34.20 GTexel/s | 23.20 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 15 Watt |
Transistor count | 4700 million | |
Compute units | 32 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Single-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 200 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 (6.4) | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 80.00 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective | |
Memory type | GDDR6 |