NVIDIA T500 Mobile vs Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA T500 Mobile and Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA T500 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- 4.6x more core clock speed: 1365 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 1695 MHz vs 1650 MHz
- Around 20% higher texture fill rate: 94.92 GTexel/s vs 79.20 GTexel/s
- Around 17% higher pipelines: 896 vs 768
- Around 39% lower typical power consumption: 18 Watt vs 25 Watt
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3339 vs 3214
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3339 vs 3214
- 2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 28574 vs 14238
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2 Dec 2020 vs 31 Oct 2020 |
| Core clock speed | 1365 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1695 MHz vs 1650 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 94.92 GTexel/s vs 79.20 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 896 vs 768 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt vs 25 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3339 vs 3214 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3339 vs 3214 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 28574 vs 14238 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 12 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 71% higher memory clock speed: 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective) vs 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective)
- Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6889 vs 5095
- Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6889 vs 5095
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3462 vs 3199
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3462 vs 3199
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 12 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective) vs 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6889 vs 5095 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6889 vs 5095 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3462 vs 3199 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3462 vs 3199 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA T500 Mobile
GPU 2: Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA T500 Mobile | Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5095 | 6889 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5095 | 6889 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3199 | 3462 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3199 | 3462 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3339 | 3214 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3339 | 3214 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 28574 | 14238 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 311 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1972 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA T500 Mobile | Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Generation 12.1 |
| Code name | TU117 | DG1 |
| Launch date | 2 Dec 2020 | 31 Oct 2020 |
| Place in performance rating | 625 | 523 |
| Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1695 MHz | 1650 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1365 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 10 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 94.92 GFLOPS (1:32) | 633.6 GFLOPS (1:4) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 6.075 TFLOPS (2:1) | 5.069 TFLOPS (2:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.037 TFLOPS | 2.534 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 896 | 768 |
| Pixel fill rate | 54.24 GPixel/s | 39.60 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 94.92 GTexel/s | 79.20 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt | 25 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4700 million | |
| Compute units | 96 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | IGP | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Width | IGP | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 68.26 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 128 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective) | 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective) |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | LPDDR4X |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA T500 Mobile with others
NVIDIAT500 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7800 GT
NVIDIAT500 Mobile vs
ATIAll-In-Wonder X1800 XL
NVIDIAT500 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7350 LE
NVIDIAT500 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon HD 8690M
NVIDIAT500 Mobile vs
AMDFirePro W5100
NVIDIAT500 Mobile vs
NVIDIATesla M10
