NVIDIA T500 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA T500 Mobile and NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA T500 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 86% higher core clock speed: 1365 MHz vs 732 MHz
- 578.8x more texture fill rate: 94.92 GTexel/s vs 164.0 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 13.1x lower typical power consumption: 18 Watt vs 235 Watt
- 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3199 vs 1032
- 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3199 vs 1032
- Around 81% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 29053 vs 16023
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2 Dec 2020 vs 12 November 2012 |
| Core clock speed | 1365 MHz vs 732 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 94.92 GTexel/s vs 164.0 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt vs 235 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3199 vs 1032 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3199 vs 1032 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 29053 vs 16023 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm
- 3x more pipelines: 2688 vs 896
- 3x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 2 GB
- 4.2x more memory clock speed: 5200 MHz vs 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective)
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7038 vs 3339
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7038 vs 3339
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 2688 vs 896 |
| Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz vs 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7038 vs 3339 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7038 vs 3339 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA T500 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA T500 Mobile | NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5095 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5095 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3199 | 1032 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3199 | 1032 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3339 | 7038 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3339 | 7038 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 29053 | 16023 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2918 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 172 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 49.455 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1666.354 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.836 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 92.472 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 275.229 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA T500 Mobile | NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Kepler |
| Code name | TU117 | GK110 |
| Launch date | 2 Dec 2020 | 12 November 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 648 | 791 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $7,699 | |
| Type | Workstation | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1695 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1365 MHz | 732 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 94.92 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 6.075 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.037 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 896 | 2688 |
| Pixel fill rate | 54.24 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 94.92 GTexel/s | 164.0 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt | 235 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4700 million | 7,080 million |
| Floating-point performance | 3,935 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | IGP | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 249.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective) | 5200 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA T500 Mobile with others
NVIDIAT500 Mobile vs
ATIMobility Radeon X2300
NVIDIAT500 Mobile vs
ATIRadeon HD 2600 XT
NVIDIAT500 Mobile vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 3430
NVIDIAT500 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 580
NVIDIAT500 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon R9 360 OEM
NVIDIAT500 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile
