NVIDIA TITAN RTX vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA TITAN RTX and AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA TITAN RTX

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
  • Around 13% higher core clock speed: 1350 MHz vs 1200 MHz
  • Around 16% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1530 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
  • 7x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz
  • Around 42% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 20081 vs 14176
  • Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 854 vs 771
  • Around 94% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 138757 vs 71562
  • Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25820 vs 13044
  • Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25820 vs 13044
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 18 December 2018 vs 13 August 2018
Core clock speed 1350 MHz vs 1200 MHz
Boost clock speed 1770 MHz vs 1530 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm vs 14 nm
Memory clock speed 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 20081 vs 14176
PassMark - G2D Mark 854 vs 771
Geekbench - OpenCL 138757 vs 71562
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 25820 vs 13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 25820 vs 13044

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

  • Around 22% lower typical power consumption: 230 Watt vs 280 Watt
  • Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7164 vs 3707
  • 9.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 30936 vs 3353
  • Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7164 vs 3707
  • 9.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 30936 vs 3353
Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 230 Watt vs 280 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 7164 vs 3707
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 30936 vs 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 7164 vs 3707
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 30936 vs 3353

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA TITAN RTX
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
20081
14176
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
854
771
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
138757
71562
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
25820
13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3707
7164
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3353
30936
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
25820
13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3707
7164
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3353
30936
Name NVIDIA TITAN RTX AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
PassMark - G3D Mark 20081 14176
PassMark - G2D Mark 854 771
Geekbench - OpenCL 138757 71562
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 25820 13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3707 7164
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3353 30936
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 25820 13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3707 7164
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3353 30936
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 14948
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 171.616
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 4031.404
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 16.925
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 247.788
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1195.863

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA TITAN RTX AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

Essentials

Architecture Turing GCN 5.0
Code name TU102 Vega 10
Launch date 18 December 2018 13 August 2018
Launch price (MSRP) $2,499 $999
Place in performance rating 21 28
Type Desktop Workstation
Price now $999
Value for money (0-100) 13.37

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1770 MHz 1530 MHz
Core clock speed 1350 MHz 1200 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 14 nm
Pipelines 4608
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 280 Watt 230 Watt
Transistor count 18,600 million 12,500 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C 4x mini-DisplayPort
DisplayPort count 3
DisplayPort support
HDMI

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 267 mm 267 mm
Supplementary power connectors 2x 8-pin 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

API support

DirectX 12.0 12.0 (12_1)
OpenGL 4.6 4.6

Memory

Memory bus width 384 Bit
Memory clock speed 14000 MHz 2000 MHz
Memory type GDDR6