NVIDIA TITAN RTX vs NVIDIA GeForce MX150
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA TITAN RTX and NVIDIA GeForce MX150 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA TITAN RTX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 44% higher core clock speed: 1350 MHz vs 937 MHz
- Around 71% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1038 MHz
- 12x more pipelines: 4608 vs 384
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- 2.8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 5012 MHz
- 9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 20362 vs 2259
- 3.9x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 840 vs 213
- 14.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 138072 vs 9584
- 6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25820 vs 4330
- 6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25820 vs 4330
- 3.8x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3794 vs 999
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 December 2018 vs 17 May 2017 |
Core clock speed | 1350 MHz vs 937 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz vs 1038 MHz |
Pipelines | 4608 vs 384 |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 5012 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20362 vs 2259 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 840 vs 213 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 138072 vs 9584 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25820 vs 4330 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25820 vs 4330 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3794 vs 999 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX150
- 28x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 280 Watt
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 280 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 vs 3707 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 vs 3707 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3353 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA TITAN RTX
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce MX150
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA TITAN RTX | NVIDIA GeForce MX150 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20362 | 2259 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 840 | 213 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 138072 | 9584 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25820 | 4330 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3707 | 3710 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25820 | 4330 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3707 | 3710 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3356 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3794 | 999 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 45.905 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 495.238 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.365 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.965 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 145.794 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA TITAN RTX | NVIDIA GeForce MX150 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
Code name | TU102 | GP108 |
Launch date | 18 December 2018 | 17 May 2017 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $2,499 | |
Place in performance rating | 109 | 875 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz | 1038 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1350 MHz | 937 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 4608 | 384 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 280 Watt | 10 Watt |
Transistor count | 18,600 million | 1,800 million |
Floating-point performance | 1,127 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 46.98 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | No outputs |
DisplayPort count | 3 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | None |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 48.06 GB / s | |
Shared memory | 0 |