NVIDIA TITAN RTX vs NVIDIA GeForce MX150

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA TITAN RTX and NVIDIA GeForce MX150 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA TITAN RTX

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
  • Around 44% higher core clock speed: 1350 MHz vs 937 MHz
  • Around 71% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1038 MHz
  • 12x more pipelines: 4608 vs 384
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
  • 2.8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 5012 MHz
  • 9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 20362 vs 2259
  • 3.9x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 840 vs 213
  • 14.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 138072 vs 9584
  • 6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25820 vs 4330
  • 6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25820 vs 4330
  • 3.8x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3794 vs 999
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 18 December 2018 vs 17 May 2017
Core clock speed 1350 MHz vs 937 MHz
Boost clock speed 1770 MHz vs 1038 MHz
Pipelines 4608 vs 384
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm vs 14 nm
Memory clock speed 14000 MHz vs 5012 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 20362 vs 2259
PassMark - G2D Mark 840 vs 213
Geekbench - OpenCL 138072 vs 9584
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 25820 vs 4330
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 25820 vs 4330
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 3794 vs 999

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX150

  • 28x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 280 Watt
Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 10 Watt vs 280 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3710 vs 3707
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3356 vs 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3710 vs 3707
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3356 vs 3353

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA TITAN RTX
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce MX150

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
20362
2259
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
840
213
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
138072
9584
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
25820
4330
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3707
3710
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3353
3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
25820
4330
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3707
3710
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3353
3356
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score
GPU 1
GPU 2
3794
999
Name NVIDIA TITAN RTX NVIDIA GeForce MX150
PassMark - G3D Mark 20362 2259
PassMark - G2D Mark 840 213
Geekbench - OpenCL 138072 9584
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 25820 4330
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3707 3710
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3353 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 25820 4330
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3707 3710
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3353 3356
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 3794 999
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 45.905
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 495.238
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 2.365
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 38.965
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 145.794

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA TITAN RTX NVIDIA GeForce MX150

Essentials

Architecture Turing Pascal
Code name TU102 GP108
Launch date 18 December 2018 17 May 2017
Launch price (MSRP) $2,499
Place in performance rating 109 875
Type Desktop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1770 MHz 1038 MHz
Core clock speed 1350 MHz 937 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 14 nm
Pipelines 4608 384
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 280 Watt 10 Watt
Transistor count 18,600 million 1,800 million
Floating-point performance 1,127 gflops
Texture fill rate 46.98 GTexel / s

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C No outputs
DisplayPort count 3
DisplayPort support
HDMI

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 267 mm
Supplementary power connectors 2x 8-pin None
Laptop size large

API support

DirectX 12.0 12.0 (12_1)
OpenGL 4.6 4.6

Memory

Memory bus width 384 Bit 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 14000 MHz 5012 MHz
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 48.06 GB / s
Shared memory 0