NVIDIA TITAN RTX vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA TITAN RTX and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA TITAN RTX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- Around 15% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1545 MHz
- Around 2% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 138072 vs 134929
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25820 vs 23659
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25820 vs 23659
- Around 7% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3794 vs 3537
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 18 December 2018 vs 20 September 2018 |
| Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz vs 1545 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 138072 vs 134929 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25820 vs 23659 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25820 vs 23659 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3794 vs 3537 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
- Around 12% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 280 Watt
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 21601 vs 20362
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 928 vs 840
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt vs 280 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 21601 vs 20362 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 928 vs 840 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3353 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA TITAN RTX
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA TITAN RTX | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 20362 | 21601 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 840 | 928 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 138072 | 134929 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25820 | 23659 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3707 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25820 | 23659 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3707 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3358 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3794 | 3537 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 394.035 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5461.22 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.104 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 174.185 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1987.605 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA TITAN RTX | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Code name | TU102 | TU102 |
| Launch date | 18 December 2018 | 20 September 2018 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2,499 | $999 |
| Place in performance rating | 109 | 91 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Price now | $1,279.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 17.22 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz | 1545 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1350 MHz | 1350 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Pipelines | 4608 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 280 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 18,600 million | 18,600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
| DisplayPort count | 3 | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | 267 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 14000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | |
