NVIDIA TITAN RTX versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA TITAN RTX and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA TITAN RTX
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 15% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1770 MHz versus 1545 MHz
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 138072 versus 136942
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25820 versus 23659
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25820 versus 23659
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 15164 versus 14584
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 18 December 2018 versus 20 September 2018 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1770 MHz versus 1545 MHz |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 138072 versus 136942 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25820 versus 23659 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25820 versus 23659 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 15164 versus 14584 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
- Environ 12% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 250 Watt versus 280 Watt
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 21719 versus 20064
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 931 versus 829
| Caractéristiques | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt versus 280 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 21719 versus 20064 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 931 versus 829 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 versus 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 versus 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3353 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA TITAN RTX
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA TITAN RTX | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 20064 | 21719 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 829 | 931 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 138072 | 136942 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25820 | 23659 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3707 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25820 | 23659 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3707 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3358 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 15164 | 14584 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 393.982 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5461.22 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.104 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 174.185 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1991.116 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA TITAN RTX | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Nom de code | TU102 | TU102 |
| Date de sortie | 18 December 2018 | 20 September 2018 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $2,499 | $999 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 93 | 91 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Prix maintenant | $1,279.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 17.22 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1770 MHz | 1545 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1350 MHz | 1350 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Pipelines | 4608 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 280 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 18,600 million | 18,600 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
| Compte DisplayPort | 3 | |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 267 mm | 267 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 384 Bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | 14000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA TITAN RTX avec des autres
NVIDIATITAN RTX vs
NVIDIAQuadro GP100
NVIDIATITAN RTX vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Ti
NVIDIATITAN RTX vs
NVIDIARTX A2000
NVIDIATITAN RTX vs
AMDRadeon RX 6650M
NVIDIATITAN RTX vs
AMDRadeon RX 7600
NVIDIATITAN RTX vs
NVIDIARTX 3000 Ada Generation
