NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2075

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 and NVIDIA Tesla C2075 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

NVIDIA Tesla C2075

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
Around 27% higher core clock speed: 732 MHz vs 575 MHz
Around 27% higher texture fill rate: 41.0 GTexel / s vs 32.2 GTexel / s
Around 27% better floating-point performance: 1,311.7 gflops vs 1,030.4 gflops
Around 18% lower typical power consumption: 210 Watt vs 247 Watt
Around 27% higher memory clock speed: 3800 MHz vs 3000 MHz
Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 34.324 vs 26.973
Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1181.463 vs 930.623
Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.978 vs 3.142
Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 58.37 vs 45.924
Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 121.575 vs 93.747
Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4590 vs 2825
Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4590 vs 2825

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	29 November 2011 vs 25 July 2011
Core clock speed	732 MHz vs 575 MHz
Texture fill rate	41.0 GTexel / s vs 32.2 GTexel / s
Floating-point performance	1,311.7 gflops vs 1,030.4 gflops
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	210 Watt vs 247 Watt
Memory clock speed	3800 MHz vs 3000 MHz
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	34.324 vs 26.973
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1181.463 vs 930.623
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.978 vs 3.142
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	58.37 vs 45.924
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	121.575 vs 93.747
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4590 vs 2825
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4590 vs 2825

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla C2075

4.8x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 1280 MB
Around 74% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3705 vs 2133
Around 74% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3705 vs 2133

Specifications (specs)
Maximum memory size	6 GB vs 1280 MB
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3705 vs 2133
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3346 vs 3333
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3705 vs 2133
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3346 vs 3333

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla C2075

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

34.324

26.973

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1181.463

930.623

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3.978

3.142

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

58.37

45.924

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

121.575

93.747

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4590

2825

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2133

3705

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3333

3346

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4590

2825

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2133

3705

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3333

3346

Name	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448	NVIDIA Tesla C2075
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	34.324	26.973
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1181.463	930.623
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.978	3.142
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	58.37	45.924
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	121.575	93.747
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4590	2825
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2133	3705
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3333	3346
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4590	2825
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2133	3705
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3333	3346
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	4197
PassMark - G3D Mark		3017
PassMark - G2D Mark		428
Geekbench - OpenCL		10563

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448	NVIDIA Tesla C2075
Essentials
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	Fermi 2.0
Code name	GF110	GF110
Launch date	29 November 2011	25 July 2011
Launch price (MSRP)	$289
Place in performance rating	766	767
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Technical info
Core clock speed	732 MHz	575 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,311.7 gflops	1,030.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	448	448
Texture fill rate	41.0 GTexel / s	32.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	210 Watt	247 Watt
Transistor count	3,000 million	3,000 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI	1x DVI
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	267 mm	248 mm
Supplementary power connectors	2x 6-pin	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	1280 MB	6 GB
Memory bandwidth	152.0 GB / s	144.0 GB / s
Memory bus width	320 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	3800 MHz	3000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5