NVIDIA Tesla C2075 vs ATI Radeon HD 5870

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla C2075 and ATI Radeon HD 5870 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla C2075

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
• 6x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 37% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3017 vs 2199
• Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 428 vs 416
• 5.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10563 vs 1858
• Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 26.973 vs 18.789
• Around 77% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.142 vs 1.775
• Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 45.924 vs 43.496
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3705 vs 3671
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3705 vs 3671

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5870

• Around 48% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 575 MHz
• 2.1x more texture fill rate: 68.0 GTexel / s vs 32.2 GTexel / s
• 3.6x more pipelines: 1600 vs 448
• 2.6x better floating-point performance: 2,720.0 gflops vs 1,030.4 gflops
• Around 31% lower typical power consumption: 188 Watt vs 247 Watt
• Around 60% higher memory clock speed: 4800 MHz vs 3000 MHz
• Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1339.688 vs 930.623
• 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 245.813 vs 93.747
• Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4541 vs 2825
• Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4541 vs 2825

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla C2075
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5870

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3017 2199
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	428 416
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	10563 1858
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	26.973 18.789
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	930.623 1339.688
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.142 1.775
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	45.924 43.496
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	93.747 245.813
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2825 4541
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3705 3671
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3346 3349
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2825 4541
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3705 3671
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3346 3349

Compare specifications (specs)