NVIDIA Tesla K40c vs AMD Radeon HD 7950
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla K40c and AMD Radeon HD 7950 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K40c
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- 2x more texture fill rate: 178.8 GTexel / s vs 89.6 GTexel / s
- Around 61% higher pipelines: 2880 vs 1792
- Around 50% better floating-point performance: 4,291 gflops vs 2,867 gflops
- Around 22% lower typical power consumption: 245 Watt vs 300 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 3 GB
- 4.8x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 1250 MHz
- Around 51% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1779.043 vs 1177.395
- Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.463 vs 5.685
- Around 49% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 103.169 vs 69.23
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 8 October 2013 vs 31 January 2012 |
Texture fill rate | 178.8 GTexel / s vs 89.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2880 vs 1792 |
Floating-point performance | 4,291 gflops vs 2,867 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 245 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 3 GB |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 1250 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1779.043 vs 1177.395 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.463 vs 5.685 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 103.169 vs 69.23 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7950
- 4.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 82144 vs 17468
- Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 63.74 vs 61.566
- Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 343.81 vs 308.261
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 82144 vs 17468 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 63.74 vs 61.566 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 343.81 vs 308.261 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla K40c
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7950
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Tesla K40c | AMD Radeon HD 7950 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17468 | 82144 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 61.566 | 63.74 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1779.043 | 1177.395 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.463 | 5.685 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 103.169 | 69.23 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 308.261 | 343.81 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 325 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4495 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7988 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3699 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7988 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3699 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1914 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla K40c | AMD Radeon HD 7950 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GK110B | Tahiti |
Launch date | 8 October 2013 | 31 January 2012 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $7,699 | $449 |
Place in performance rating | 531 | 534 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 4,291 gflops | 2,867 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2880 | 1792 |
Texture fill rate | 178.8 GTexel / s | 89.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 245 Watt | 300 Watt |
Transistor count | 7,080 million | 4,313 million |
Boost clock speed | 1250 MHz | |
Compute units | 28 | |
Stream Processors | 1792 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 267 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 2x 6-pin |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 3 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 288.4 GB / s | 240 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
FreeSync | ||
PowerTune | ||
ZeroCore |