NVIDIA Tesla K40c versus AMD Radeon HD 7950
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Tesla K40c and AMD Radeon HD 7950 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Tesla K40c
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 8 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 178.8 GTexel / s versus 89.6 GTexel / s
- Environ 61% de pipelines plus haut: 2880 versus 1792
- Environ 50% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 4,291 gflops versus 2,867 gflops
- Environ 22% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 245 Watt versus 300 Watt
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 12 GB versus 3 GB
- 4.8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 6008 MHz versus 1250 MHz
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1779.043 versus 1177.395
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.463 versus 5.685
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 103.169 versus 69.23
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 8 October 2013 versus 31 January 2012 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 178.8 GTexel / s versus 89.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2880 versus 1792 |
Performance á point flottant | 4,291 gflops versus 2,867 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 245 Watt versus 300 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 12 GB versus 3 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6008 MHz versus 1250 MHz |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1779.043 versus 1177.395 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.463 versus 5.685 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 103.169 versus 69.23 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 7950
- 4.7x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 82144 versus 17468
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 63.74 versus 61.566
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 343.81 versus 308.261
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 82144 versus 17468 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 63.74 versus 61.566 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 343.81 versus 308.261 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla K40c
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7950
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Tesla K40c | AMD Radeon HD 7950 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17468 | 82144 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 61.566 | 63.74 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1779.043 | 1177.395 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.463 | 5.685 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 103.169 | 69.23 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 308.261 | 343.81 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 325 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4495 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7988 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3699 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7988 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3699 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1914 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Tesla K40c | AMD Radeon HD 7950 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
Nom de code | GK110B | Tahiti |
Date de sortie | 8 October 2013 | 31 January 2012 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $7,699 | $449 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 531 | 534 |
Genre | Workstation | Desktop |
Conception | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 745 MHz | |
Performance á point flottant | 4,291 gflops | 2,867 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2880 | 1792 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 178.8 GTexel / s | 89.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 245 Watt | 300 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 7,080 million | 4,313 million |
Vitesse augmenté | 1250 MHz | |
Unités de Compute | 28 | |
Stream Processors | 1792 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Nombre d’écrans Eyefinity | 6 | |
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 267 mm | 267 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 2x 6-pin |
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 12 GB | 3 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 288.4 GB / s | 240 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 384 Bit | 384 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6008 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
FreeSync | ||
PowerTune | ||
ZeroCore |