NVIDIA Tesla K80m vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla K80m and NVIDIA Quadro K5000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K80m

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
  • 32.4x more texture fill rate: 2x 182.2 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 67.31 GTexel / s
  • 3.7x more pipelines: 2x 2496 vs 1344
  • 5.4x better floating-point performance: 2x 4,373 gflops vs 1,615 gflops
  • 6x more maximum memory size: 2x 12 GB vs 4 GB
  • Around 67% higher memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 3000 MHz
  • 3.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 17090 vs 5107
  • 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 64.435 vs 24.713
  • 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1476.444 vs 685.1
  • 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 75.764 vs 28.929
  • 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 198.978 vs 68.712
  • 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.289 vs 2.189
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 17 November 2014 vs 7 August 2012
Texture fill rate 2x 182.2 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 67.31 GTexel / s
Pipelines 2x 2496 vs 1344
Floating-point performance 2x 4,373 gflops vs 1,615 gflops
Maximum memory size 2x 12 GB vs 4 GB
Memory clock speed 5012 MHz vs 3000 MHz
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 17090 vs 5107
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 64.435 vs 24.713
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1476.444 vs 685.1
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 75.764 vs 28.929
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 198.978 vs 68.712
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 6.289 vs 2.189

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K5000M

  • Around 7% higher core clock speed: 601 MHz vs 562 MHz
  • 3x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 300 Watt
Core clock speed 601 MHz vs 562 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 100 Watt vs 300 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla K80m
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K5000M

Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
17090
5107
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
64.435
24.713
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1476.444
685.1
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
75.764
28.929
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
198.978
68.712
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
6.289
2.189
Name NVIDIA Tesla K80m NVIDIA Quadro K5000M
Geekbench - OpenCL 17090 5107
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 64.435 24.713
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1476.444 685.1
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 75.764 28.929
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 198.978 68.712
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 6.289 2.189
PassMark - G3D Mark 2752
PassMark - G2D Mark 350
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 4825
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3712
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 4825
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3712
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3353

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Tesla K80m NVIDIA Quadro K5000M

Essentials

Architecture Kepler 2.0 Kepler
Code name GK210 GK104
Launch date 17 November 2014 7 August 2012
Place in performance rating 805 801
Type Workstation Mobile workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $329.99
Price now $391
Value for money (0-100) 8.47

Technical info

Boost clock speed 876 MHz
Core clock speed 562 MHz 601 MHz
Floating-point performance 2x 4,373 gflops 1,615 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 2x 2496 1344
Texture fill rate 2x 182.2 GTexel / s billion / sec 67.31 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 300 Watt 100 Watt
Transistor count 7,080 million 3,540 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 MXM-B (3.0)
Length 267 mm
Supplementary power connectors 1x 8-pin
Laptop size large

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_1) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2x 12 GB 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 2x 240.6 GB / s 96 GB / s
Memory bus width 2x 384 Bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 5012 MHz 3000 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Shared memory 0